User talk:Goddolphin1777

January 2024
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, White hole, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 21:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I have autism ,and can't explain myself properly ,I've been called stupid all my life ,I should know better to post anything ,those with autism have special gifts they see things others don't . I was going to re edit and add content for those who always want proof ,but unfortunately it would take up too much time using a cell phone ,my computer has not been able to access the internet ever since Facebook shut my page down ,CIA ,Military ,whoever doesn't want me to tell others what I know. So do what you want ,I was going. To leave this comment as to either edit my poor description or delete it, it don't care anymore. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 01:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I have autism and I thought what I added was very poor in descriptive terms and very hard to add or too time consuming to do by cell phone ,I've been shut down from the internet on any computer I use to relay this info which I can easily add sources and all facts to back my information  As too keep this information quiet ,no content was changed  ,just added, content ,sources were going to be added later as I have mentioned ,very time consuming ,I've been called stupid in my  early years , and maybe trying to prove I'm not ,but someone will also find a reason to make you look stupid   so if you want to delete or edit ,I don't really care anymore .but there's one thing to think about  .is why  are galaxy's created. By a Supposed Supermassive Black Hole ,not  a Supermassive White Hole ?  So there's 2 supermassive holes that do completely opposite of each other. I don't really need sources if no one can answer that question. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 02:08, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Having autism is no excuse to put unsourced content on Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * my information is not unsourced this information comes from the James Webb telescope ,that specifically has stated that ,all information of our universe does not match with theories of the big Bang therefore all previous mainstream information must be revised ,since wikipedia supports the James Webb telescope, new theories an new  information must be accepted ,to explain the missing or incorrect content that is written as true meaning in the wikipedia as a false statement ,or false or incorrect theories .sources can always be edited in later ,but if these sources are all based on theories than no source can be a reliable theory. Since James Webb has stired up confusion to mainstream scientists ,the big Bang theory is incorrect ,all other theories connected to the big Bang will also be incorrect, as  supermassive White holes were considered hypotheoretical because they did not fit or were accepted by mainstream scientists ,with the new information released by the JWT ,supermassive White holes ,worm holes ,dark matter dark energy ,a universe in a containment of vacuum cluster galaxies an older universe or multiuniverse are the only possible theories left ,whether accepted or not ,by whoever ,those who disagree unfortunately will have no choice but to accept the new information. Years of time spent studying the old theories by scientists will be all deleted ,mainstream scientists will do anything to keep these theories as true. I feel sad for them the time spent to be proven wrong ,as technology improves every day. Therefore ,if new (theories ) with support of James Webb ,wikipedia must accept this new information sourced by James Webb . Goddolphin1777 (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If a source is needed ,than put one in Goddolphin1777 (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * it is nearly impossible to source every sentence of information just by memory alone ,this is ridiculous one sentence sourced by relativity by Einstein ,next by quantum mechanics ,next by NASA ,next by James Webb ,next by physics etc etc .then some idiot decided to delete it all because of no sources ,that takes time with edits at a later time ,and makes a stupid comment of being autistic is no excuse or this or that or fkn whatever . I'm sure people like you enjoy this. Wake up buddy your ad dumb as the scientists ,and if you can't accept it than find something other to do than to annoy others . Goddolphin1777 (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ive read the talk page ,from others you have given a hard time.about the supermassive White Hole ,the reasons given for their edit ,were petty ,although some information I read I did  agree that should have been edited as it had nothing to do with the topic. But sometimes when the topic is connected with another sometimes to explain properly another topic must be included ,as a work hole ,a neutron star, a contained universe ,dark matter ,they are all connected ,to creation ,nothing is created by a singularity ,it begins with it. No Goddolphin1777 (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Being autistic ,,meaning I see things much differently and much more clearer then neurotupical minds ,but lack the explainion abilities ,yet,Stephen Hawkings with his disability iw widely accepted theories connected to a White Hole ,Hawkins radiation, he knew . Scientists, don't want to go that direction ,which would prove their theories incorrect. I know I'm wasting my time explaining to you. Because your brain can only accept so much info before it shuts down. Lol. Sorry but that's what I've been told by the neurotupical . It's a shame . Where I've been called stupid because I can't verbally explain things ,where I may think your stupid because you can't understand what I'm trying to explain. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 19:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to make you see the light of a white hole ,but your stuck in a black hole. Remember that. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 20:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * in fact buddy ,I challenge you ,if you have anything written in wikipedia ,you let me know in a reply ,I will prove you are right or wrong in your information .I do not judge others .hopefully your wrong and I can do what you've done to others ,kharma always wins . Goddolphin1777 (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * my last comment ,is ,by the amount of people who agree there must be a white hole if they read this comment
 * By. No it's not a white hole ,with all respect,someone must Change the White hole title meaning to Supermassive White Hole ,there is no White hole like there is no black hole it's one or the other. The end result must be called ultramassive to create a universe .period. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Damn . What I meant to say was white holes supermassive White holes and ultramasive white holes are completly different, a white that is caught in a black through expansion movement near the end of the universal expansion max ,clusters of black holes expand as more and more are clustered together with no where to go ,to the point of supermassive black hole large enough to envelope a complete galaxy . The suppermassive black hole envelopes another and creates an Ultramassive black hole large enough to create another universe .to an infinite chain of events Goddolphin1777 (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Creation
Creation is the only answer to questions mainstream scientists possibly can't or don't accept,al theories are based on Mathematics ,Physics,Quantum Mechanics,Relativity, Religion ,Simulation etc. Creation is based on imperfection ,as we know nothing or no one is perfect ,whether we except it or not .it's fact.everything is created .therefore all theories must be based on creation only .and all theories based on any thing else but creation will have a mystery ,or with the growth of technology be proved invalid .Creation will always throw a unexpected detour from what was expected or predicted by those who have used theories of their choice,although the theories seem reasonable and aren't to far off from creation .there will always be a point where theories become just theories ,those who couldn't accept Creation are now shut down,because the proof from technology becomes overwhelming ,If you had your information on creation ,it will never lead you astray. simple but sometimes frustrating when answers are questionable, but eventually will become clear if you stay on that path. Example: The Big Bang Theory ,scientists refused to accept certain events that are there ,right in front of their eyes ,yet they do not accept them due to the mathematical equations or? That work out to,say physics or Creation etc. Here's where it all gets crazy, scientists will not accept any answer but by mathematics ,physics will not accept scientist mathematics ,so on and so, but they forget that there is no one there to argue to hat creation is the only answer.that leaves only us the people who see the truth ,but are shot down by mainstream .mainstream has been proven time and time again ,they are not a reliable source , so how does their theories have more power over any other. resolve : if scientists and all other groups can get together ,and come to a reasonable theory between all. That find creation is the only answer ,use their mathematics ,physics religion etc put all information together. Guess what an,Amazing event will happen ,they will find the answer to every question in the universe. No more mysterys. Goddolphin1777 (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)