User talk:Godinpédia

Category:Female superheroes
Hello,

This category was deleted a while ago as an unneeded, and unwarranted split of Category:Superheroes.

Please do not recreate these types of categories without prior discussion.

Thanks,

- J Greb (talk) 17:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm 117Avenue. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Manitoba Liberal Party leadership elections, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 06:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Linking
Hi, thanks for your work on Wikipedia. Just one thing: we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms (including country-names). Cheers and best. Tony  (talk)  09:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1635 in Quebec


A tag has been placed on 1635 in Quebec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. StevenJ81 (talk) 03:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I wasn't sure why this one year in this one province was sufficiently important. StevenJ81 (talk) 03:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, Godinpédia. Vous avez de nouvelles messages chez StevenJ81's talk page. Message added 13:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC). You can [ remove this notice] at any time.

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Mark Womack (Canadian actor)
You recently moved Mark Womack (American actor) to Mark Womack (Canadian actor). The article did say he was Canadian, but as far as I can tell that was vandalism and he's an American actor. However, before moving the page back to "American actor" I figured I'd ask you if you had some other reason for stating he was Canadian.

(Anyway, is he even notable? Perhaps the article should be simply deleted, instead of keeping it anyplace.) Sideways713 (talk) 13:26, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Claudio Encarnacion Montero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudio Encarnacion Montero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Claudio Encarnacion Montero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  23:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Deaths in 2013
Please include a relaible source when adding entries to the Deaths in 2013 page - any entries without a citation are removed in order to comply with BLP policy. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011 in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2011 in the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  23:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1975 in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Austin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Births of the September 11 attacks
Category:Births of the September 11 attacks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 08:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simon Kruger


The article Simon Kruger has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:BLP1E. Not notable. Kids go missing all the time, most get found, like he was. WP:NOTNEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Personality with a animal survived
Category:Personality with a animal survived, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there, thank you for your edits but you must read the guidelines about  biographies of people notable for only 1 event and how  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper. Not every subject of news reports deserves an article. The need to classify people by how they been helped by animals is also very unlikely to be defining characteristics. Finally, from your phrasing, it appears that English isn't your first language. There are lots of other wikipedias in almost every language, with most other language wikipedias lacking many significant articles. It might be best if you contributed in your native language. As you obviously understand English you could try translating articles from English into other languages. regards, The-Pope (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Vrak.TV
Category:Vrak.TV, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1981 in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Walsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mona the Vampire
Template:Mona the Vampire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 09:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Mona the Vampire characters


The article List of Mona the Vampire characters has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject. No real world, encyclopaedic article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:Mona the Vampire
The purpose of navboxes is to facilitate easy navigation between related Wikipedia articles. They should therefore contain only links to valid Wikipedia articles. This means that links to websites outside Wikipedia should not be included. Per WP:NAVBOX redlinks and multiple links to individual articles should not be included. Mona the Vampire has been modified accordingly to comply with WP:NAVBOX. Please do not restore non-compliant links to the template. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove templates notifying other users of deletion discussions
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Template:Mona the Vampire. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Removing the deletion template does not stop the deletion discussion. If anything, it hurts the page, because editors who might be inclined to recommend the page be saved don't know the deletion discussion is ongoing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll add to the above that it has been explained to you that navboxes should not contain redlinks, multiple links to the same articles and external links, yet you've persisted in restoring these to Template:Mona the Vampire. Persistently restoring this content is disruptive and should not continue. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 08:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Mona the Vampire characters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mona the Vampire characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Mona the Vampire characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 04:23, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2000 in Brazil


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2000 in Brazil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 02:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 1915 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson


 * 1916 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson


 * 1917 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 1911 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson


 * 1912 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson


 * 1913 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson


 * 1914 in Canada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Mathieson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (2004 in Brazil) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2004 in Brazil, Godinpédia!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article is mostly empty."

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of József Barsi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article József Barsi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/József Barsi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AldezD (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fiqri Azwan Ghazali


The article Fiqri Azwan Ghazali has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Saskatchewan general election, 2015 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Saskatchewan general election, 2015. Since you had some involvement with the Saskatchewan general election, 2015 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 21:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC) I assume this page was created in a page move. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 21:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1635 in Quebec


A tag has been placed on 1635 in Quebec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 1635 in Quebec for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1635 in Quebec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1635 in Quebec until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BangJan1999 19:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)