User talk:Godmadeuniverse1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Godmadeuniverse1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Rio Dell, California does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 04:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, that welcome message didn't say exactly what I was hoping for. Making an edit specifically for the purpose of changing the terms already in use in an article from "same-sex" and "opposite-sex" to "heterosexual" and "homosexual" can be seen as trying to push a particular point of view in violation of the NPOV policy.  The *-sexual terms are more politically charged, and are less neutral.  Please do not edit articles specifically to insert these less neutral terms.  Thank you. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rio Dell, California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930856 on 2011-09-17T06:09:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rio Dell, California, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you! -- Logan Talk Contributions 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Rio Dell, California. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rio Dell, California, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97178 on 2011-09-19T00:02:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969767 on 2011-09-22T04:53:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Rio Dell, California
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rio Dell, California. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no autoblock on your account so far as I can tell. Open up Sandbox and try to save a trivial edit. If you can save a change there, you are not blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 05:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rio Dell, California, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rio Dell, California was changed by Godmadeuniverse1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961082 on 2011-09-26T05:31:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing with the same edit war that led to your previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Heterosexual and homosexual are in the dictionary. Political pressure could have been put on the census bureau. The amount of straight people and homosexuals should not be on pages about towns and cities. 'Same-sex' isn't neutral and uses the word sex when homosexuality is the opposite of sex. Your terms are distortions not accurate or neutral and your trying to push your 'Neutral Point Of View' which is not 'Neutral'.


 * Please could you keep unblock requests or other comments in their chronological order, as it makes life much easier for us. On the other hand, it isn't compulsory.... Peridon (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)