User talk:Goejreen

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Osmanagić pyramid hypothesis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Osmanagić pyramid hypothesis was changed by Goejreen (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860548 on 2014-03-12T14:59:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Osmanagić pyramid hypothesis with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Osmanagić pyramid hypothesis with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Osmanagić pyramid hypothesis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)