User talk:Goethean/Archive 9

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mona Charen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CPAC ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mona_Charen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mona_Charen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

T. Peter Park
A longshot, but a decade ago you wrote the article on T. Peter Park. Any chance you would have his contact information (email)? The one I found online from old listservs is dead. czar 18:29, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Last one I have is tpeterpark at erols dot com. Haven't heard from him in years. &mdash; goethean 00:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Ya, that's the one that bounced. Oh well, thanks anyway! (not watching, please )  czar  00:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Saikat Mondal


The article Saikat Mondal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable per WP:NACTOR and WP:NAUTHOR, no substantial coverage online in WP:RS, apart from the local press article cited"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 82.132.213.30 (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Aperspectival listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aperspectival. Since you had some involvement with the Aperspectival redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Amartya Sen, a page you frequently edit, needs more inline citations. You can remove the tag once you have solved the issue. THE NEW  Immortal  Wizard  (chat) 19:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rakta Yamari.jpg


The file File:Rakta Yamari.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:William irwin thompson.JPG


The file File:William irwin thompson.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail
Ignore this, sorted. Doug Weller talk 12:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
—— Serial # 10:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
—— Serial # 10:39, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Black Lives Matter have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —— Serial # 10:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Serial Number 54129. Thank you. —— Serial # 10:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your argument is absolutely precious and should be used as an example in a Logic 101 class. "I don't like the label on your edit, therefore I've removed the edit." Let it be a lesson to us all. Never consider the merits of the actual case - always depend on bureaucratic nonsense to get your way. &mdash; goethean 10:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , I revdelled the edit summary - it was a clear and serious BLP violation. I have no view on whether the person should or should not be listed in the article's infobox, but you can't say things like that about people. Girth Summit  (blether)  11:55, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

David Ray Griffin
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:David Ray Griffin § Description and interests. Thank you. Roy McCoy (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of United States Representatives who supported Texas v. Pennsylvannia


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of United States Representatives who supported Texas v. Pennsylvannia. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Participants in Texas v. Pennsylvania. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Participants in Texas v. Pennsylvania. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 21:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * k thx &mdash; goethean 16:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Participants in Texas v. Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IL-12. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Group Member notice
Your name is listed as a participant of the WikiProject Countering system bias in religion. I would like to know if you agree with this edit: DIFF. 24.78.228.96 (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

"Economic suicide" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Economic suicide. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Integral thought/theory template
Hello - it looks like you were the creator of Template:Integral theory (perhaps originally as Template:Integral thought?)  The template is at this point nearly unused and I was thinking of nominating it for deletion. I see in the process that I should notify the template creator so here I am- do you have any objections? Every single theme or institution page has by now been merged into Integral theory (Ken Wilber). Of the people that the template lists, only one page (Erich Jantsch) still displays it, and only in a subsection (even Wilber's page doesn't show it!).

Ixat totep (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Humans
Template:Humans has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quoting a portion of a sentence
Dear Goethean. I came across your question of the 16 December 2009 at the Village Pump about "quoting a portion of a sentence". I feel that you did not really get a clear answer. That is now long ago, but perhaps you still remember. Have you solved the problem? I often add quotes in citations, mainly to clarify what I intend to cite on the given page of the source. To keep quotes short, I often omit parts of the sentence that are not immediately relevant to the text supported by the citation. You will find examples of this in Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty, such as "... when Cromwell was recalled to England on account of the threat from Scotland ...". As you see I use ellipses, but perhaps they are not needed? With many thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. At the time that I asked the question, I was engaged in a struggle with followers of the Ramakrishna Mission over material at the Ramakrishna article. My question had a polemical subtext against my opponents. So I was not really asking an innocent question. My opponents, incidentally, won the struggle, removing all reference to Ramakrishna's sexual activities from the article on religious grounds. &mdash; goethean 16:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear Goethean. Thanks for your quick and kind reply. It shows me that a wikipedian of your caliber would have expected ellipses when quoting only part of a sentence. With many thanks and kind regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Association for Transpersonal Psychology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association for Transpersonal Psychology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Association for Transpersonal Psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Xurizuri (talk) 02:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Transrational


The article Transrational has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "this article appears to be redundant. What it discusses appears to be nothing more than a renaming of precognition, which has its own article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)