User talk:Going under1967

August 2012
Your recent editing history at World of the Dead: The Zombie Diaries shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0  08:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at World of the Dead: The Zombie Diaries, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Mdann52 (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, okay understood although it appeared to be vandalism as referenced reviews to sites like AintItCoolNews and TimeOut magazine have been removed by Bradswanson2010, for no reason other than to try and discredit the film. There are also additions I have reverted that allege one of the directors personally blamed Harvey Weinstein, which is incorrect and seems to be to try and discredit them and get them into trouble. -(Going under1967)
 * Look, my best advice is just leave the page alone - you don't want to be blocked as well. Mdann52 (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)