User talk:Goingairborn

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Russell collins may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. —Caesura(t) 00:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:HPIM0199.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:HPIM0199.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Bogus edit to "Labor Day"
On the article on Labor Day, you changed the first sentence to add the clause "except for in Clemson, SC where the holiday is regarded as unimportant and is not celebrated". This appears to be bogus, and may even constitute vandalism, as the clause seems to be intended to impugn Clemson somehow, and I already see a warning on your talk page about vandalism. I don't see any references on the Web describing this supposed fact being true, and am inclined to believe it false unless otherwise confirmed by good evidence, and regardless of this, encyclopedic facts added to Wikipedia must be verifiable. I have therefore reverted your edit. --Drake Wilson (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)