User talk:Goku DBZ

Speedy deletion of "Takao Okawara"
A page you created, Takao Okawara, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 17:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Lorelei: The Witch of the Pacific Ocean (film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lorelei: The Witch of the Pacific Ocean (film), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0406941/combined. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Sinking of Japan (film)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sinking of Japan (film), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Sinking of Japan (film) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sinking of Japan (film) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sinking of Japan (film) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sinking of Japan (film) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sinking of Japan (film).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 02:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Puraido
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Puraido, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unreferenced article about future film release

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DAJF (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with School of Ghost Stories 3
Hello. Concerning your contribution, School of Ghost Stories 3, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, School of Ghost Stories 3 appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. School of Ghost Stories 3 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:School of Ghost Stories 3 and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:School of Ghost Stories 3 with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:School of Ghost Stories 3.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lorelei 2005 (film)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lorelei 2005 (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unreferenced article with no meaningful content.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DAJF (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Cross Fire
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Cross Fire, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Cross Fire appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Cross Fire has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cross Fire and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cross Fire with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cross Fire.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 10:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of No Worries on the Recruit Front
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article No Worries on the Recruit Front, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unreferenced article with no content and no indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 72.75.110.31 (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome, Goku DBZ
Welcome to Wikipedia, Goku DBZ. I noticed several articles you had started on films by very high-profile directors, such as Shūsuke Kaneko, and that they were being proposed for deletion. I strongly disagree with Wikipedia's tendency to delete rather than work, but this is the way it is done here today. For films such as these, it is relatively easy to find sourcing (even if it's only in Japanese), and to include a sentence or two which shows that the film is notable-- won some award, or that it is from a major director/studio. I have removed the Proposed Deletion tags from four of your articles, and added a minimum of sourcing/notability. It used to be that we could build up an article slowly, bit by bit, at Wikipedia, but, unfortunately, and to the harm of Wikipedia, I believe, those days are now gone. In order to avoid your articles getting deleted in the future, I encourage you to make sure your articles already include some level of sourcing and text before you post them here. A large group of editors spend their time here simply looking for new articles to delete, and sourcing and text will make your articles less of a target. Happy editing, and regards. Dekkappai (talk) 18:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Caution about using text copied verbatim from other websites
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 06:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of God's Left Hand, Devil's Right Hand
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article God's Left Hand, Devil's Right Hand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Insufficient information to show notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I removed the 'prod' tag after adding external references for the film and wikilinks to notable members of the cast. Certainly the article can and should be improved further to establish the subject's notability. Did it win any awards or break any box office records? Wavehunter (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Second warning about use of copyright text in articles
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 11:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Third warning about use of copyright text in articles
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Fourth warning about use of copyright text in articles
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Anurag Kashyap
Any specific reason behind deleting references to his television work, and explanations in the writer section of his filmography? Mahakali... was an important event, and the writer section currently reads as if he wrote all those films in their entirety. Last Contrarian (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Goku DBZ! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Takao Okawara -

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahul Puri


A tag has been placed on Rahul Puri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 22:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Goku DBZ, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Rahul Puri have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Rahul Puri. Please stop adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)