User talk:GoldenPenny

 Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, GoldenPenny! My name is GrooveDog. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Architect Mr. Zvi Hecker.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Architect Mr. Zvi Hecker.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 01:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

GA review of Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer
Hi -- I noticed you promoted Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer to GA, but I don't see your review anywhere -- did you forget to post it? Per the instructions at WP:GAN/I, the review is supposed to be at Talk:Pirkei De-Rabbi Eliezer/GA1, but the only comment there is that you plan to review it. At a minimum there's a requirement that you list the spotchecks you performed, and it's expected that you make comments in the review so others can tell what you looked at and any comments you have. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Mike, Thank you so much for reaching out, and I am sorry for not seeing your post sooner. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I had attempted to post the checklist, but the system somehow converted it into "failed" and I was not sure how to fix it. I saw that many people have submitted reviews and comments over the years and those were addressed. I genuinely believe that the article meets the criteria. I will try to fix my deficiencies soon. Again, thank you and have a nice day.GoldenPenny (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem; these things happen. Do you still have your notes? If you could add a summary of what you looked at to the GA review page, ideally with a note of what sources you spotchecked, that would be great.  Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey GoldenPenny, I have reverted the promotion of the article given that it's now been a week. From a procedural standpoint, you did not close the GA review, so the article is still a good article nominee. Like Mike suggested above, I would ask that you add your comments to the review page as soon as possible so that the nominator can respond to them or the discussion can be closed. Let me know if you have any questions! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 04:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)