User talk:Goldsztajn/Archives/2021/July

Mail Notice
Celestina007 (talk) 20:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello :

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is currently a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Thanks for your feedback
I would be more than delighted to work with you in making Otokoto riots of 1996 into a good article. This would probably be the sole article I intend to make a good article, make it into a Dyk and possibly make it a featured article. I do not care about trifling issues such as I have “so and so” good articles and whatever vanity that is associated with having good articles, my sole concern is the article is of immense encyclopedic value. I re-examined the criteria for articles becoming a GA and found none wanting as all criteria were met (Apparently I was wrong), you are my superior and you know best, this is your forte as nabbing UPE and spam is my forte. working with you to achieve this would be a privilege. I have gone ahead to remove the nomination as you instructed, and as aforementioned I would want to work with you to achieve this. Any suggestions you make would be appreciated. Celestina007 (talk) 14:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm juggling a couple of things over the next two weeks here that have my priority, but if you're happy to move a little slowly and aim for a nomination towards the end of next month, that should give me ample time. I did have a quick look over the article and will leave some initial comments on the talk page for you to consider. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There’s no rush I am happy to do as you have requested. Thank you I appreciate any and all feedback. Thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hello how are you ? can you give us your opinion to this article [] thanks a lot --Football lover 2020 (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Jeremy Schwartz
Thanks for reviewing Draft:Jeremy Schwartz is business person not media person. Most sources are coming from business sources and not media. What do you suggest to do in this case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwartz Jeremy (talk • contribs) 10:51:30 2021-07-19 (UTC)
 * Hi, are you are the same person as the article is about, or someone writing for them on their behalf? If you are new to Wikipedia please be familiar with WP:BASIC and WP:INDEPENDENT. In general, because of the nature of business and the resources available for self-promotion, the independence of sources is particularly important.  In the draft the only sources I would consider reliable and independent are the articles from the Evening Standard, the Guardian and Stuff. The draft needs more pieces such as that, for example  or . With the other sources: the Independent article does not mention Schwartz. The Boston Consulting Group is an employer and reprinting quotes directly from yourself (?). Youtube is not a reliable source.  Apple podcast is an interview. (Interviews are generally discounted as a source as few subjects critically assess themself in an interview).  Saving tomorrow's planet is a self-published source; it might be notable if it was independently assessed in a reliable source. Professional Jeweler is a marketing website, simply repeating a press release.  Hope this helps, regards--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not the same person that the article is about. Yes I am a beginner this is my first post on wikipedia. I understand that not all sources are verified. I can clarify with you if I remove all unverified sources and shorten the article to the size where only verified ones will be used. This will allow it to be published. Thanks for your answer! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwartz Jeremy (talk • contribs) 2021-07-21 09:57:02 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you clarify, if you are not the person the article is about, are you writing for them on their behalf? Your user page says there is a conflict of interest; what is the nature of that conflict? My concern regarding the article is not about verification, but reliability. If the article only uses reliable sources this will improve things, but it will not automatically mean the article will be accepted: please note the guidelines regarding WP:SIGCOV. Also, when you leave a comment, please add ~ at the end of your comment as a signature (this will be converted automatically).  Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Goldsztajn

I was at the master class led by Jeremy, I wanted to find information and did not find an article on Wikipedia, then I decided what needed to be added, and here I probably made the first mistake and created an account for such names. The conflict is because someone has already tried to publish it with the same name.

A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. 07:29, 30 March 2006 Jeffrey O. Gustafson talk contribs deleted page Jeremy Schwartz (A7) (thank) 21:38, 8 April 2005 Docu talk contribs deleted page Jeremy Schwartz (content was: 'test' (more Wikipedia:Shortpages cleanup)) (thank)

Excuse me for the questions, I eat how I can finish what I started. Schwartz Jeremy (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, unfortunately your username is against Wikipedia policy; please see WP:REALNAME. I would strongly encourage you to apply to have your username changed: Changing username/Simple Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

GA review
I hope you're good. I've nominated Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind for GA today after improving it for a number of days. Although, it is better to wait, I thought to ask you if you've any time for the review, just because I've seen you around the AfDs related to Muslim scholars and institutions associated with the Deobandi movement. Thanks in advance. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  16:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, doing well, thanks, hope you're safe and well, too. I've got my hands quite full for the rest of this month both here and offline (am already committed to three GA reviews at present). If someone doesn't take it, I'll try to have a look in August. Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 03:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm happy to tell you that the article is now a GA! ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  16:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, excellent! Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Sheikh Jarrah property dispute&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:2019–2020 Hong Kong protests&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft
Hi you recently review Draft:List of films and television programs based on based on Disney theme-park attractions and I just wondering if you mind helping fixing it up P+T 92.236.253.249 (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Check out the Tea House, if you ask a question there you will be able to find help. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)