User talk:Golfertig

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Y not? 03:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

3 revert rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  03:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Based on your edits, you are User:72.80.119.208 who is currently blocked for vandalism. Therefore this account is blocked as well. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  17:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2008
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

That edit was done by me, I just hadn't logged in. Just restore my editing powers, and we'll both be careful to log in each time with unique user names. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golfertig (talk • contribs) 02:37, October 6, 2008

And BTW, when you have a Wiki war with an admin, he'll use every bureaucratic trick to have his way. I think that there is a conflict of interest here with AlistairMcMillan who I disagreed with on the iPod touch article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golfertig (talk • contribs) 02:39, October 6, 2008
 * If you begin edit warring after your block expires, you will be blocked again. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Then what do you do when you think something is wrong with the article?

2. I know that forums can't be a source for fact, but can I bring a forum with over 300 complaints about the same issue as a source that there ARE complaints?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golfertig (talk • contribs) 21:35, October 6, 2008

Firstly please don't pretend that you were edit warring with me. At a glance, in the space of a week your edits to iPod Touch were also reverted by User:JGXenite, User:Thumperward, User:Islander and User:74.14.220.119. Consensus on this issue is clear. Policy on this issue is clear. Anonymous forums are never acceptable as sources.

Secondly the block is permanent. This account has been used to edit war on two separate articles, and little else. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)