User talk:Gollem

If you would like to comment or to deliberate: feel free to start a discussion below (or at nl:User talk:Gollem)!

Welcome!
Hi, Gollem. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hitro  talk  20:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robin of Sherwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherwood ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Robin_of_Sherwood check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Robin_of_Sherwood?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ø (Disambiguation) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Ø (Disambiguation) is the actual, full name of the album Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I wasn't experimenting. I did not know that the are part of the title. The confusion could have been prevented by giving the article a less confusing name: Ø (Disambiguation) (Album), but strangely there seems to be no consensus for such improvement. Gollem (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

NMA
Please explain your objections. They are too vague. Thank you. Zaslav (talk) 05:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * See Talk:NMA
 * Gollem (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello
My edit on World War III was referring to America having a rivalry with both Russia and China, I would like to add it back. Firekong1 (talk) 12:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The rivalry with Russia could be considered to be mentioned already by mentioning the war in Ukraine, as this is the main (cause for the) current rivalry. Gollem (talk) 16:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * But I think it would also make sense to mention Russia as an adversary of the United States whilst also an ally of China, since all three powers are the largest factions involved in this conflict. Firekong1 (talk) Firekong1 (talk) 01:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Russia and China aren't such close allies in the war in Ukraine. The allies of the US are way more important in supporting Ukraine e.g. when the US halted the supply of ammunition. I am mot sure how to add that all concisely in the text of the intro. I think it is better to descibe these kind of details in the section "Russian invasion of Ukraine: 24 February 2022 – present" instead. Gollem (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I disagree, Russia and China are proxy allies against the United States and their allies. I believe I can find some articles which document this, if it helps. Firekong1 (talk) 22:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The intro mentions 2 risks for WWIII. 1. War in Ukraine: No need to mention China here, Russia has more allies that provide significant support. 2. China becomming the largest economic and military power in the world: No need to mention Russia here, there are more opportunistic countries that would take advantage of such power shift. I think we should not mix these 2 risks up in the intro. Gollem (talk) 05:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)