User talk:Golucky2020

Welcome!
Hello, Golucky2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jacob Abrian did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jacob Abrian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jacob Abrian. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, it seems that you to have created your username to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jacob Abrian and Arab Fashion Council. In particular, you have been continuously adding the same information which violates the three-revert rule even after being politely warned by other contributors. Your continuous persistence to modify the same pages is a sign of possible vandalism. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Robschnell (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 01:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed the information you've been trying to add. We can reliably say that a petition for winding up (liquidation) has been filed against AFC. We cannot comment on the outcome, because we do not have a reliable source for the outcome. Companies House disclaimers their information, saying that don't verify it, so it's not usable as a source. Further, that level of detail is uncalled for in the article on its CEO.
 * If you think the information should be expanded, provide new sources and discuss the matter on the talk page. However, if you attempt to readd the same text, you will be blocked, at least from those two articles, for persistent disruption. —C.Fred (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)