User talk:Gomes1882

Speedy deletion of IMScouting
A tag has been placed on IMScouting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dekisugi (talk) 14:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Dekisugi (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

IMScouting
Just a friendly note about IMScouting. I took the liberty of userfying it for you before deletion. You'll find the text at User:Gomes1882/IMScouting, which will give you some time to work on it.

Take a few minutes to read WP:WEB to see what needs to be in an article about a website to demonstrate notability. Although you did have a couple of independent sources in the article, they were pretty much passing mentions. Something more substantial is needed to show that this meets WP:N and WP:WEB.

When you think you've got what's needed in the article, put a tag (note the curly brackets) here on your talk page and have an experienced editor take a look at it for you.

Hope that helps.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, that article is still not ready for redeployment yet since it has not shown enough assertion of importance according to our notability standards. As a reminder, please follow WP:CITE when citing references.  Have a great day.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  guestbook  ♦  contribs  14:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)