User talk:Goncharovbkru

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place unblock on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.

OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment You were given a final warning in February because you were spamming the same links as this IP, which had already been warned about spamming. You ignored the warning and spammed again, which is why you were blocked.  OhNo itsJamie  Talk 19:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Re: Comment The first time (in February) I have added the external link to the Russian version of the site. I believed that the blocking reason is not English language of the site. Therefore, the second time (in July) I have added the link to the English version of the site. It is not the Spam because the site does not contain advertising, does not offer the goods and services. This site contain only short description of history and locations of unusual monuments of Moscow. Goncharovbkru (talk) 05:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Regardless of warnings telling you to stop, you have continued to promote your website on Wikipedia. The content of the website has absolutely nothing to do with your block. What is your affiliation with the site? --Smashvilletalk 14:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The reason I have added the external link the second time is wrong understanding of the warning, not fraudulent intent. Because I believed my mistake is addition of the Russian-language link in first time (On 26 February). When I added the English-language external link the second time (On 22 July) I believed that I have repaired the mistake. I did not ignore the warning, I have misunderstood reason of warning. I promise: 1) add the information on Discussion pages, not articles pages. 2) clear up the warning reasons if those are in the future. I edit the website, but not promote it. The reasons I edited article "Moscow" are a paucity and highly specialized materials of external links in article, and full compliance website with the subject of "Moscow" article. Goncharovbkru (talk) 09:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)