User talk:Gonzonoir/Archive 3

re submission of my addition to Di George Syndrome.
Hello Gonzonoir

thanks for the reply.

I just hope i can successfully freely contribute to wikipedia as i have an awfull lot of knowledge i could share to help others in life.

I do want to

* Build consensus • Resolve disputes * Assume good faith • enjoy Civility • assume everyone shares Etiquette * not to endure personal attacks •without legal threats

i am a newby and have been hounded off by craigsy refering the hylton castle article, politics local to sunderland.

but wish to equally contribute without remarks made about my own educational ability bearing in mind i have been born in England and use ,well, my native language as questioned by """north north west""" in his slanderous replies.

Can I get this submission I made on di George syndrome in a separate article sub section to help Judges who do use wikipedia in the legal research to get the facts right.

If yes, how do you bring back the deleted work and re correct it under the right format ?

Regards

Mr Snowball

--Mr Snowball (talk) 13:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Mr Snowball. Take a look at our legal disclaimer: Wikipedia does not give legal opinions and can't give legal advice. Though I'm sure lawyers and judges do read the encyclopedia, we can't create any material aimed specifically at them. As an encyclopedia, all our content has to be intended for a general readership. For that reason, a separate section of the Di George syndrome article wouldn't be appropriate.
 * You might want to look at other places to host material that Wikipedia can't accept. Our list of alternative outlets may be useful. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Revert.
Hello,

I was going to revert that edit onMicrosoft Word but decided against it. The IP removed a statement that had a references as a blog post. He removed the blog post and the statement that it supported, re-wrote the section and added a tag. I am kind of thinking of putting it back to his version but would like your input first. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 11:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hm. The diff I'm looking at has him actually just arbitrarily cutting out a chunk of prose, including breaking a word ("translation") in half, which had the effect of moving a fact tag previously appended to the section's last sentence (and dated Feb 07) stuck up in the middle. Do you see it differently? Gonzonoir (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep I see what you are talking about. Good eyes!--gordonrox24 (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, it's nothing, you're just better at assuming good faith than I am ;) Gonzonoir (talk) 11:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

SPL Portal
Hello,

You marked the SPL Portal page for deletion. Please undo this action. SPL Portal is a new software product for an focused group of phramaceutical users. The population of users is small, but nonetheless, they are out there and looking for solutions to the FDA's recent guidlines for submitting product labeling in SPL (XML) format.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctrautman1 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi: I think you must have the wrong person. I've never edited Structured Product Labeling. Gonzonoir (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I've now found the article you mean. SPL Portal was deleted six weeks ago because it was an expired PROD. My concern, in proposing it for deletion, was that the article did nothing to show how the software met Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion: it didn't cite any references to show that the subject had been covered in multiple, reliable sources. That's our baseline for notability, the determinant of whether Wikipedia can have an article on a subject.
 * What to do next: as a regular editor I'm unable to restore deleted articles, but you can request that the deleting admin, SchuminWeb, restore it. Just leave a note on his/her user talk page. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Besida
Thanks for the quick response. I was coming back to the Besida article to add a referrence, and found that you already added one! You deserve a barnstar with pierogi clusters! Pustelnik (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! I like to add refs to promising stuff I turn up during new page patrol. And the barnstar sounds delicious :) Gonzonoir (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Super-trivial note
Hi Excirial. Just wanted to drop a line to say that you're misspelling "Response" in your edit summaries when you handle questions on the Help Desk and NCHP (you have it as "Responce", which leapt out at me because, in my native British English, a "ponce" is a pretentious person). This is super-trivial, but I reckoned I'd want someone to let me know if they saw me doing something similar (so please do, if you do!). I only noticed because you're such a prompt, prolific contributor on those two pages - keep up the awesome work! Gonzonoir (talk) 09:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notification! My ability to prevent such errors in kind of reliant on spell-checkers and unfortunately the one integrated in Google chrome seems to be less then perfect as it only catches errors when you select words. Since "Responce" seems perfectly natural to me i assume i have been spelling it this way for months at least (At least i didn't spell it correctly even once in 500 edits). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 10:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Satan's Harvest Home DYK Issue
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Geraldk (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter (June 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  17:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks so much for copy editing Phineas Flynn! I've been needing other people to contribute to it, as it's currently a GAN. So, thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 19:50, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! I saw it at DYK, and since I have a bad habit of watching P&F in idle moments, even though I'm 26 :-S I thought I'd give it a once over. If you'd like more attention to the prose there, I'd be happy to give it another look: the edit I made was fairly superficial, and I think there are other areas that need re-wording with reference to sources. Just let me know if that would be useful. Gonzonoir (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, that'd be great! BTW, do you GA review? Because I've had three articles based on the series up for a bit now and the backlog of the list is starting to get irritating, lol. Anyways, yeah, another look over it would be great!  The Flash  {talk} 20:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I've given it another go, and left a few comments on the talk page. I'm afraid I'm probably not going to have time for a GA review just at the moment, but good luck with it! Gonzonoir (talk) 20:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 21:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And for your work...


 * Thanks, Flash! That's very kind. I'll pin it to my sash :) Gonzonoir (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Zana e malit
No problem. - Biruitorul Talk 15:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Junior Farmer Field and Life Schools
Good morning, it seems that you have deleted a new page that was trying to insert about the Junior Farmer Field and Life Schools, which is the programme i work for and worked for a few years now. The justification was this here below: (Blanked content that copyviolates http://fex.ennonline.net/29/juniorfarmer.aspx) Gonzonoir (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Since the schools in Swaziland and Namibia have been mentioned in the page i tried to create, i would like to have a few more details in how i can have my page inserted in wikipedia. Thank you Maya2301 - 29/06/2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.202.78.206 (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your message. I removed your edit for a few reasons:
 * You posted it on a help page, rather than into a new article.
 * It was a direct copyviolation of http://fex.ennonline.net/29/juniorfarmer.aspx - Wikipedia can't accept material that infringes copyright.


 * You will need to first register an account, which has many benefits, including the ability to create articles. Once you have registered, please search Wikipedia first to make sure that an article does not already exist on the subject. Please also review a few of our relevant policies and guidelines which all articles should comport with. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles must not contain original research, must be written from a neutral point of view, should cite to reliable sources which verify their content and must not contain unsourced, negative content about living people.


 * Articles must also demonstrate the notability of the subject. Please see our subject specific guidelines for people, bands and musicians, companies and organizations and web content and note that if you are closely associated with the subject, our conflict of interest guideline strongly recommends against you creating the article.


 * If you still think an article is appropriate, see Help:Starting a new page. You might also look at Your first article and How to write a great article for guidance, and please consider taking a tour through the Tutorial so that you know how to properly format the article before creation. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, if you are User:Maya2301, don't forget to sign in. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Assessing Satan's Harvest Home
I'll give pointers for B-class on the article talk page, if you don't mind. --an odd name 13:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

How to replace an old url with the new url globally in all pages--Help Desk
Hey, just fyi, the user was on the right page; he was asking how to replace url's on Wikipedia pages, or at least that's my understanding. Cheers, Finger  z  09:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, cheers. Sorry, that wasn't how I read it. I'll change my response. It's a slightly ambiguous query, and the user's made some slightly odd amendments to the post (changing the example URLs many times), so I'll ask for clarification. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Prod of Menublob
Hi, just a quick hello and to say I support your PROD on Menublob, and have marked the article with a PROD2 in agreement with your reasons to delete. Trevor Marron (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers. Someone's speedy tagged it as well, so perhaps I erred too far on the side of caution. I'm not super-familiar with web content notability guidelines so thought it better to be cautious. Gonzonoir (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, some people are too quick to tag for speedy. Menublob probably is a candidate for speedy, but I gave it the benefit of the doubt too. Trevor Marron (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit request
Hey! I've recently created the article "Dude, We're Getting the Band Back Together" and have nominated it for a GA; would you mind copyediting it for me just to make sure it has better luck in it's GAN? Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 03:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure - I can do that this evening (UTC time). Gonzonoir (talk) 11:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Great, thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 14:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks a bunch, the article's much better now.  The Flash  {talk} 19:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No probs! Don't take any of my changes as set in stone, by the way - it's still a wiki, and you're still free to change back anything you think I've made worse. Anyway, I've left a further note about the article on your user talk. Best of luck for the GA. Gonzonoir (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:Dude, We're Getting the Band Back Together
Actually, it was an email sent through a correspondence on the Wikia Wiki for the show from another user. I'll link so to verify. If you're referring to the TV.com ref, that was an old set of codes that was verified by Jeff Marsh but he checked again and it was wrong - so, that, along with the majority of sites on the internet, are wrong about production code. Also, thanks for the compliment.  The Flash  {talk} 19:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gotcher - who knew there could be so much intrigue in a TV production code. Gonzonoir (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, believe it or not, that was a pretty big controversial topic for that wiki that is still not fixed even with the list, lol :P  The Flash  {talk} 04:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robert Keable
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.
 * Responded over on Template Talk:Did You Know with this edit. Gonzonoir (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

George Constantine (Archdeacon)
Thanks for tidying the article up, much neater. Thanks for pointing out the 1959 issue, have now corrected. FruitMonkey (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome - and thanks for putting the archdeacon safely back in the 16th century :) I figured it should probably have been 1559, but my guessing hardly amounts to making the encyclopedia more reliable. Gonzonoir (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Slastic
Thank you for having redirect my user page. It was a mistake, it's the first time I try to do it and I went to correct it. Could you erase the "bad" article which have my name, please? I dont't know how to do it now! Thank you again. --Slastic (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem- it is an easy mistake to make. An admin has already deleted Slastic, the version you created in articlespace, so there's no more to do. All the best. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you again. --Slastic (talk) 13:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Phineas and Ferb
Hey! Some great news for the article, it's now being reviewed for GA status. But the reviewer highly suggested I have it copyedited; are you available to do so? Thanks in advance.  The Flash  {talk} 04:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to see it has a reviewer - unfortunately I'm very busy IRL at the moment. I should be available on Sunday, but that may be too late for what you need. Gonzonoir (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That's fine, as someone already copyedited it. :)  The Flash  {talk} 17:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah! OK. Well I'm just giving it another revision now. Let me know what you think when I'm done. Gonzonoir (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's great. I'm happy with the rewording, I think it's finally at a clear level of prose to get the GAN passed! Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 19:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Executive physicals
Hi. I didn't actually merge the article myself, however I placed tags on the talk page, per the guide to closing AfD debates, here and here. As for closing the AfD early, I actually didn't relise that the time being displayed was GMT+10, not UTC! I had actually redirected the pages to start with, in error, as I actually hadn't carried out the merge. I'm so sorry for the confusion. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 20:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Grand - so I've now carried out the merge. Gonzonoir (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Robert Keable
Hi there - I see you've this article up at GAN. I don't know that I will get to it, having tied myself up with somewhat less worthy projects at present (see Talk:Wedding industry/GA1), but I was looking at your references and wondered whether you would consider the notes and references system rather than refs alone with the full ref where first occurring: see Ode on a Grecian Urn for an example. I just think it's more accessable and makes for tidier notes that can then sit in two or three columns instead of one. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That seems like a very sensible suggestion, thanks. I'll take a crack at reorganizing the refs. (This is the first article I've written that has so many references to the same material (though I should probably apply this suggestion to the Trouble with Normal article too), and I got a bit bogged down.) All the best for the Wedding industry GA: I'll just trail that the Keable article has wartime heroics, Jazz Age priest-authored erotica, game fishing, and Pacific islands romance. Not that you should let that tempt you :) Gonzonoir (talk) 07:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup 1 August
FYI, the fourth Cambridge meetup will occur on the afternoon of Saturday 1 August. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

A request
Hey. Normally I'd bring this to the Copyeditors Request Page, but it's been really dead lately and is flooded with backlog. As I wish to bring the article to GA and FA status soon, I would really appreciate it if you could copyedit Dan Povenmire. It'd be a huge help! Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 15:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries; I'm glad to do it. Will probably get to it tomorrow; is that OK? (Btw, how are your GA noms going? I think I'm going to have a long wait for a reviewer for Robert Keable, heh) Gonzonoir (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Fantastic! Phineas and Ferb is currently being review while the others have yet to be, unfortunately. At least that way I can focus more on one GA at a time, I suppose, lol. And too bad on the Keable article, GAN has had backlog issues forever, it feels - I wouldn't be surprised if they did another sweeps or even the backlog cleanup from earlier this year.  The Flash  {talk} 16:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, hey, just checking in, seeing if you forgot or was just simply busy. Are you able to? Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 00:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hiya, just asking for a bit of a confirmation on if you're available to do the copyedit? Cheers!  The Flash  {talk} 03:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! Don't feel bad at all, it happens to us all, I remained patient so it didn't really bother me :) I'll go check it out now! Thanks!  The Flash  {talk} 16:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Keable review
I've done the review - it is very short, because it is such a good article. My only significant suggesiton is an expansion of the lead. I've put it on hold and will check back. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's awesome - thank you! I will have a crack at your suggestions later, when back in the company of my notes. Thanks again. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Downloadfreaks on wikipedia
Hello,

I would like to make a request.Can I post about my site on wikipedia.By doing this I can get more members on my site.So I hope that you will allow me to post my site on wikipedia.

Sincerly, Rockondudes (Admin of Downloadfreaks.darkbb.com0 (Co-founder) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Subhkanish6 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and doesn't allow advertising. There are other wiki-like sites that could host your article - see the "Directory" listings at Alternative outlets for some suggestions. Gonzonoir (talk) 10:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Ethan Hawke
Hey Gonzonoir, sorry to bother you, but I came across your name at the League of Copyeditors participants list and I'm not sure whether or not your taking requests, but here it is: I was hoping that in your spare time you can copy-edit Ethan Hawke's article, as I'm trying to aim the article to Featured article status. If you have time, I would appreciate your help a lot. But, if you are occupied, no hard feelings. :) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  23:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi ThinkBlue - sorry, I've been away from the computer most of the weekend. I'll take a look at this tonight for you. All the best, Gonzonoir (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, no need to apologize, everyone is busy, so its understandable. Thank you, Gonzonoir, I appreciate this so much. If you have a question about something in the article, please let me know and I'll see to it that you get your answer. ;) -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  14:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've replied at the talk page. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  17:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Free Trade Union
Pse see the discussion page re the above. Thanks. Mikeo1938 (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied over there. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Pse see discussion page for my reply. Mikeo1938 (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Kahaloo
I notice you tweaked but I think it should just be merged with Kahaloo Upazila cos it is the same place just with the Upazila missing off the Kahaloo page. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC) or re-direct?--Alchemist Jack (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree - I've redirected (since there was no information on Kahaloo that Kahaloo Upazila didn't already contain. Good spot. Gonzonoir (talk) 07:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Facebook Lite
Everyone (4 users) thinks it should be merged. I have never merged pages before, so I am not completely sure what to do next. Shall I go ahead and add it to the (probably) Features section on the Facebook page? Or is there some other mysterious wiki process that still needs to happen? Sorry to be asking you the questions but you seem to know what is what, and I seem to spend a lot of time reading and not quite grasping policy and help pages. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey - didn't have very long, so I've just done the merge myself - here are the steps I took, for future reference:
 * Close the "merge" discussion and note the consensus, by adding

to the top of the session about merge on the talk page, and to the bottom.
 * Click "edit", and copy the text from the article to be merged (Facebook Lite) onto the clipboard
 * Load the destination page (Facebook), find an appropriate section (I thought it fit with the interface evolution, since Lite is an alternate interface), and click edit: paste the text from Facebook Lite in there. I made a few edits to the text I'd pasted as well, dropping an uncited sentence on speculation and adding another source.
 * Save my changes to Facebook with an edit summary pointing to the consensus for merger (at Talk:Facebook Lite).
 * Replace the text at Facebook Lite with #REDIRECT Facebook , which links to the relevant section and categorizes the redirect page that will result, and leave an edit summary again pointing to the consensus for merger.
 * On Talk:Facebook, add a template pointing readers of that page back to the Facebook Lite talk page, should they need it.


 * And I think that's all it needs :) Is that all clear? Think you could do one yourself now? Gonzonoir (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I will find another candidate for merger and give it a go! --Alchemist Jack (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Advent Training
Hi Gonzonoir

Thanks for the message. It was just the kind of feedback I was looking for actually.

To prove notability of the company, should I include reference to where Advent has been covered in independent sources? Things like press coverage?

Also, I've put this live as a stub, which I guess is the right thing to do?

Finally, one of the main reasons for me doing this (I've been upfront and pointed out I work for Advent) is that our main competitors are also on Wikipedia. So if we're not allowed on, I guess they're not either?

Thanks for your help

Computermaven (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi there - sorry for the slightly belated reply. Thanks for being so open about your connection to Advent. To answer your questions one by one:
 * Yes, press coverage is exactly the sort of thing that could establish notability. It should be independent coverage, not press releases. Have a read of our guideline on reliable sources for more details.
 * Stub tagging isn't terrifically important - it's mainly an aid to other editors who might be looking for something to expand - but yes, that was a good call for that article. Stub tagging does not, though, mean that an article is held to lower standards of notability. The best thing you can do is to add references that establish notability before you post the article into the main article space. You can do this by working on a draft version in your own user space beforehand.
 * It doesn't automatically follow that an article on your competitors justifies an article on Advent. The other company might be notable where you are not (the company I work for rates Google as a competitor; I'm absolutely sure they're notable and we're not (yet :) ) ) It's also possible that the competitor might not be notable and that its article might merit deletion, but that nobody's got round to reviewing its notability yet. See our guideline "Other stuff exists" for details on why it's hard to extend notability arguments by analogy.
 * Does this answer your questions? Cheers. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)