User talk:Goo goo bot

December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Axilla has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Axilla was changed by Goo goo bot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985034 on 2019-12-01T23:32:58+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Axilla. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Goo goo bot", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is a misleading username because it implies that you are a bot while you are not. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. – UnnamedUser (open talk page) 23:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gail Borden, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cochrane–Africatown USA Bridge. Surachit (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 00:14, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)