User talk:Good kitty~enwiki/blah blah blah

2005 Atlantic hurricane season
Hi. I see that you may have some objection to using my image. Anyhow, firstly, it's standard protocol to use an image of storms at max intensity, even if it's not a written rule - Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Stan, Hurricane Dennis, Hurricane Emily, Hurricane Rita, Hurricane Wilma, Hurricane Beta for examples.

Anyhow, if you insist that your picture is at maximum intensity, I'm not going to argue with you.

PS: Beta's main picture is also a Navy pic (orange lines). Does that mean you'd like to change that, too? NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 02:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I think users should only contribute the highest quality of content to Wikipedia. I won't point out the images in the article that aren't maximum intensity because someone actually worked on those pictures and I don't want them to be replaced. Images that are full color and of high resolution should never be replaced by colorless and blurry ones if they serve their illustrative purposes. Good kitty 04:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I updated your image with a higher-resolution one of the same thing. The name of the image is rather confusing - since it really was taken December 4, next time you should probably use that date or at least mention it in the "Summary" part of the page. Would you mind if I re-uploaded the picture to a better file name and asked for deletion of your original? Thanks! --AySz88 ^ -  ^  02:58, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * That sounds good. Good kitty 04:15, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Moved to Image:Hurricane Epsilon 4 Dec 2005.jpg; the old name is pending speedy deletion. --AySz88 ^ -  ^  06:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Image problems
You said Hurricane Maria infobox images didn't work. But I don't know what image you were trying to put up, so I have no way to figure out what the problem could be. Jdorje 04:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I already uploaded a scaled-down version. There's no need to give it a new name. Jdorje 03:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, by reverting your changes I'm not entirely sure you're wrong. But we should delete *one* of the copies on the server.  Your 4000x4000 image is better than my 1500x1500 one, I imagine.  I added db to your image on the server, but if you want to move it over go ahead.  Or just upload a new version at the original filename.  I suspect 3000x3000 would look better than 4000x4000 though. Jdorje 03:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * We probably tried to do the same thing at the same time, but I've not been able to overwrite images lately (which is totally unrelated. I just have no idea why uploads are not working for me). 4000x4000 is probably close to the maximum size, and I recall some other images working at that size. If you could overwrite it with a larger one that would be good. Good kitty 03:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Tropical Storm Zeta 2005.jpg
I uploaded the new version you provided. --AySz88 ^ -  ^  04:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Alpha AMOA 2005296 250m.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alpha AMOA 2005296 250m.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone images
Hey I've see you upload a lot of very good tropical cyclone images from NASA and provide high quality image tags for them. As NASA imagery is the vast majority of the time in the public domain, it would probably be most appropriate to upload the images to Commons and write the improved tags there where it can be utilised by other Wikimedia projects besides en.wiki. In particular, when an Image is hosted in Commons it should not have an image description page on en.wiki, with the exception of meta-data like FeaturedPicture. Thanks!--Nilfanion (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

AHS article infoboxes
In this change you added year dates to the infoboxes of the 2003 AHS article, claiming that all other AHS articles also have years. But they don't - all the other AHS articles I see do not include the years. Nor should they, as the years are all (with the exception of Alice and Zeta) the same, and cause formatting problems by making the text too long for one line in the infobox. — jdorje (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Heh heh. I took a look at the 2003 and 1999 season articles as I recall, which did not have the year. Regardless, it seems clear to me that there is no fixed standard yet, so we need to make one. I would suggest that the year should not be included (because it makes the formatting easier) and that it should be removed from those AHS articles that have it. — jdorje (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)