User talk:Goodbucket

Welcome!

Hello, Goodbucket, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jim Chapman (Canadian), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 02:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Jim Chapman (Canadian)


The article Jim Chapman (Canadian) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 02:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Chapman (Canadian) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Jim Chapman (Canadian), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Chapman (Canadian) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Jim Chapman (Canadian)
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jim Chapman (Canadian), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jimchapman.ca/pages/biography.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 06:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

How to verify copyright permission for article Jim Chapman (Canadian)
Hello, Goodbucket.

Thank you for your interest in donating material from http://www.jimchapman.ca/pages/biography.html to Wikipedia. Since we do not currently have a method in place to verify the identity of account holders at account creation, we must verify such donations through external processes. The article has been blanked to allow time for that verification to proceed.

The simplest way to verify is to place a release on that external website putting the material into public domain or co-licensing it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL, which permit modification and reuse, even commercially, as long as authorship credit is given. This release is irrevocable and must continue to be displayed, or the material may need to be removed. A statement such as the following would be sufficient: "The contents of this website (or page, if you are specifically releasing one section) are available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 and the GNU Free Documentation License, unversioned with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts." If you decide to take this route, please put a link to that release on Talk:Jim Chapman (Canadian) so we can restore the contents.

Alternatively, you may choose to send an e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL. There is a boilerplate release form at Declaration of consent for all enquiries which can be helpful. Please provide a clear link to the website in your e-mail and specify by name the articles on Wikipedia in which the material is being used. Once your e-mail is received and processed by a member of the Communications Committee, the article's contents will be restored if your release is legally sufficient. Please make a note that you've done this on Talk:Jim Chapman (Canadian) to help guard against premature deletion of the page. You can compose a note or very simply paste the following on the talk page, brackets and all:

If you decide you don't wish to release the material into public domain or under the terms of CC-BY-SA and GFDL, you are welcome to rewrite the text from scratch at [ this temporary page]. As long as the material is otherwise compliant with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it will be used to replace the previous contents. Please leave a note at Talk:Jim Chapman (Canadian) saying you have done so.

We apologize for the additional steps necessary, but as copyright is a matter of legal concern, we must ensure that we not only protect the rights of copyright holders, but also guard the Wikipedia project against inadvertent infringement.

Before verifying permission, please first review the material to ensure that is compliant with Wikipedia's requirements for verifiability and neutrality and does not contain "original research". (If you are closely related to the subject matter, you may also want to read our conflict of interest guidelines; if you are unfamiliar with Wikipedia, you should review Starting an article or Your first article.) Even if permission is verified, material may be modified or removed if it is otherwise inconsistent with our policies and guidelines.

The article will be revisited in about a week to see what additional steps have been taken or may be necessary. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. We also have a help desk which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers.

Thank you. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Work in progress
I've created a temporary copy of your article at User:Goodbucket/Jim Chapman (Canadian) if you want to keep working to get it up to standards. Good luck. — Satori Son 18:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Goodbucket (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Jim Chapman
For what it's worth, I'd be happy to restore the page to your userspace for you if you'd like. It'll be at User:Goodbucket/Jim Chapman.

Just so you know, I don't mean to imply that topics of primarily local notability can never be included in Wikipedia — heaven knows many already are — but because the scope of their notability is so much smaller, it is admittedly a lot harder to surpass the burden of proof than it would be for a broadcaster on a national network. I often explain to people that you can very often pass our notability guidelines if you start from the assumption that the primary audience for your article is someone on the other side of the world — instead of writing for someone who just wants a bit more information about someone they already know and listen to on the radio every day, write for someone who's never heard of Jim Chapman before, and try to explain why that person should be interested in him: has he won a major broadcasting award, did his show have a documentable effect on the political or social culture of the city, that kind of thing. Imagine that you're talking to someone who lives in Singapore or the Czech Republic, and try to make a reasonable and properly referenced case that he's important enough that they need to know something about him.

Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay, never mind about the recreation, I see that Satori already restored it for you. But please do still keep the rest of my advice in mind, because aiming for an international rather than a local audience really is a valuable approach to take on Wikipedia if you want to create a genuinely keepable article. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)