User talk:Goodreg3/Archive 3

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chic Brodie (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy First Minister.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  21:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Inappropriate images
Can you please refrain from adding irrelevant images to sections of various articles. Multiple of your recent edits have involved adding random images into articles that have no relevance to the section they are inserted into. Please ensure all image insertion complies with MOS:IMAGES, and in your case specifically MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 11:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stirling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stirling railway station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Rig TV series.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:The Rig TV series.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Conversation single.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Conversation single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Bare urls suggestion
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Scotland! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the cite web template to cite a web page:

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:
 * Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:
 * 1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Inline citations. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 06:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Louis Makepeace. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WP:DOB is one of the more critical areas of WP:BLP and there is no room for WP:BLPPRIMARY. Toddst1 (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Louis Makepeace for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Makepeace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Louis Makepeace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Laun chba ller 18:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Annie Lennox Why Music Video.png


The file File:Annie Lennox Why Music Video.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:DECORATIVE non-free use of a video screenshot in Annie Lennox which fails WP:NFCC. Non-free screenshot such as this are sometimes allowed when the screenshot itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary or is used to illustrate some representative filming technique per WP:NFC, but neither of those apply in this case. The video and the song it's for are mentioned in that particular section are mentioned, but none of the relevant content requires the reader actually see this particular screenshot. There's no sourced critical commentary about Lennox's physical appearance in the video or any of the make-up or costuming that she used; so, there's no reason why the reader needs to see Lennox as she looked in video. Omitting the screenshot will not be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the section in any way."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Your edit to Scottish Football Association has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scotland into Media of Scotland. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:North Ayrshire arms.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:North Ayrshire arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Downham
Hello Goodreg3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jack Downham for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   01:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silicon Glen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livingston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Scotland, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''You have been around here perfectly long enough to know what warring is. That you believe yourself to be right is no justification.'' Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The controversial motto in question here has been included as the national motto on the article since as far back as September 2007 with no dispute. I would have thought, and as is mostly common and courtesy, that such a bold edit and removal of long-standing information is usually discussed and agreed between others first. You have been around here perfectly long enough to know what the general rules and best practices are when making edits, and that you, yourself, believe yourself to be right is no justification. It could be argued that you should be providing references to support your claim that Scotland does not have a motto. Why has a piece of information that has been included since around September 2007 with no dispute suddenly caused such upset here? Goodreg3 (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm addressing the continually disruptive nature you of your behaviour, not content. Discussion of the article should take place there. That said, long-standingness of material does nothing to absolve it from being supported by sources. What's more, the supposed motto that I removed on 3rd June is not the one that was in place in September 2007 and you yourself have been flip-flopping between advocacy of one or the other. I have never made any such claim, that Scotland has no motto, instead that there is far from clear support from the sources that it does have one. That's the way it works here; that material must be supported, not that anything is allowed unless actively disproven. Seriously, whether you've been here 8 or 16 years, you can't be under that misapprehension? Do you want this to be a rigorous and accurate work of reference or do you just want to “win” by getting things in, on a technicality, that you believe to be true? Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Bare URLs in Scottish articles
Hello. Could you take the time, in the future, to convert your references to their full versions? Just that I have, in the past few days, had to tag both Premiership of Humza Yousaf and Humza Yousaf for using bare urls. Cheers, Tim O&#39;Doherty (talk) 21:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)