User talk:Goodshoped35110s/Archive 12

Believe me, lately, I have gotten a big pile of crap, read on and see what I mean...

UAA
You might want to tone it down when you encounter inappropriate usernames: "Oh, and you've been reported to WP:UAA" (with no wikilink) comes off as brusque and officious. While reporting to UAA was the correct thing to do, it can be more gentle.  Acroterion  (talk)  16:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Got it. - Go od  sh oped 22:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sfmuni logo.png
This image is copyrighted by Muni, and per our fair use policy, is only allowed on articles. I have removed all instances I can from your userspace. Please check the copyright information of an image before using it. Thanks. — Kurykh  20:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, I'm not too enamored with your user and talk pages. They're too cluttered with fluff, with little space for useful information and constructive purposes. — Kurykh  20:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. OK. Thanks. I was meaning to replace the logo with something else, and yes, they are getting a bit wild, so I ain't taking out my camera anytime soon. And, actually, the clutter is mostly from this user, and he's a bit funny. - Go od  sh oped 22:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:RBI is the best we can do. — Kurykh  23:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Please go here. - Go od  sh oped 04:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

RFCU
See Requests_for_checkuser. You need to refactor your request and put it in the IP section. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 22:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I just went by there, actually. I'm on my way. Oh, and I'm not sure whether you ran into one or more PeeWees, but, they've been vandalizing one or more articles with penises and such, but if you have any information, you can go here. Thanks for letting me know and have a Happy Thanksgiving. - Go od  sh oped 23:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Lol
I was honestly thinking the same reason for the low vandalism! :) Jmlk  1  7  09:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
(From FireRaider)

Thanks for reminding me. Of course I don't do spam. I'm a mod on a graphics forum. I just needed to quickly transform a bunch of links in html code that I could save as and reupload to somewhere private, and then use a download manager to get all the images in one shot :P

I honestly hope you didn't check them out, cause they are kinda... freaky... .__.
 * Lucky I didn't. Oh, and can you please sign with 4 tildes? Forgot to remind you. Like this: ~ . - Go od  sh oped 20:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize the sandbox. If you want to conduct experiments please use the sandbox. Free free to enjoy Wikipedia and do edits! Thanks! Emsley (talk) 02:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I was using the sandbox! I was conducting the experiments of multiple copyright infrigment and the tags. Wait a minute, is that not acceptable? - Go  od  sh oped 02:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Username reporting
Hi Goodshoped35110s, I removed your report of User:Ni-Shi Productions to WP:UAA. We don't block user names such as this on sight. Rather, names must present the need for immediate action (as is noted on the page's instructions). Thus, for example, if that user were to start promoting ‎Ni-Shi Productions, then it would be a good additon to that page, or if the name is inherently offensive, etc. When you come across a user such as this, consider placing uw-username on their talk page. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Editor Review
I have given you an editor review. I hope it helps.  Marlith  T / C  04:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Oh, and three users just popped up at the editor deletion page. :) - Go od  sh oped 04:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Bad news
Did you see the EfD template on yor page? --Gp75motorsports (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did. Don't worry! Have a sense of humor, won't ya? - Go od  sh oped 22:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ohh, yes I see. Funny.:))) --Gp75motorsports (talk) 04:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

That's not fair!
There is nothing wrong with User:Bongwarrior's userpage! Why on earth do you want it deleted? It isn't my place to say so, but if it were, I'd say you are not a very nice user; requesting that perfectly fine user pages be killed for no reason, indeed! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I only nominated it for editor deletion. Did I CSD it, because I remember EFD it. - Go od  sh oped 23:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't even know what that initial-talk means, but "editor's deletion", if it's some kind of joke, is just as cruel as giving someone a piece of gum, when it was really cardboard. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a joke! - Go od  sh oped 00:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

So you're saying that his page won't really be deleted? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you think? - Go od  sh oped 00:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

It won't? Oh, good! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Clearly you thought it was for real, huh. Don't worry, some Wikipedians are like that. It's all OK now. - Go od  sh oped 00:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if I overeacted. I've inherited a lot of European stereotypes, and from my German ancestry in particular, I have trouble finding these things funny sometimes. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

RE: Pee Wee
Hi. This was the result of the IP check. Unfortunately there was still quite a lot of vandalism when those ranges were reblocked. I am tempted to unprotect the articles to see what happens, but will discuss with the protecting admin first. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 00:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Got it, but I seriously doubt that will still help. But, we have to be ready! Thanks for your help. Cheers and happy holidays, - Go od  sh oped 00:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:High
It's a joke. The template is  Marlith   T / C  03:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I got it and passed it to this user. - Go od  sh oped 03:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Would this work?  Marlith  T / C  05:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, still could work. I was thinking of a more diamond-of-ish thing, but this could work. Thanks! - Go od  sh oped 05:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Cody's Books
Hi, the AfD was just withdrawn as a keep, but you may want to consider expanding out the article and listing sources from this news archive search. If you were to use info from, and source to, at least 5-10 of the news articles there about Cody's Books, the article will effectively be protected forever from accidental deletion via Articles for Deletion. I'd do it, but I don't know that I'll have time. Could make for a decent article with that material. Cheers. • Lawrence Cohen  05:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoa, I was improving the article without knowing the AfD was gone to pass, but thanks for supporting! - Go od  sh oped 05:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

oOoo
o o o look who I got to sign my guest book! XD PhilB   ~ T/C 07:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

UAA
I come across you quite a lot at WP:UAA, but could you keep the reasons you list down a bit? Godkiller6661 isn't "an attack on an specific user, includes profanities, obscenities, or references to genitalias or sexual slangs". It's offesnive, true, but all the choices are a bit much to read through! Cheers, Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try. I usually have a habit in overwhelming the reports a little bit. - Go od  sh oped 00:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

RE:RFA
I decline the nomination. I am not ready yet. I should be by about... Say, April or May of next year. Thanks anyway.  Marlith  T / C  01:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Same time as me! I'll keep it just in case you change your mind. - Go od  sh oped 01:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Humor page
After a particularly long session editing Need for Speed Pro Street, I decided to create this page, containing what Wikipedia considers to be the answer to the Ultimate Question About Life, Existence, and All the Universe, to relieve some stress, and I think it's funny. I hope you do, too. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The link's busted, and I'm out huntin' for vandals. It's a level 2, man, get your rifles! Oh, right, I haven't stocked up on some. Oh well, hunt for them anyway. - Go od  sh oped 01:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixed! And also, keep an eye for LEO, willya? He hasn't done anything in three days, but what he has done has been tagged as POV pushing. Also, he's been attacking DIREKTOR, making it look like he's a Giove puppet. (loads Uzi) I'm watchin' this guy. Best, --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Got it. - Go od  sh oped 01:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait, are you sure you have the right IP? - Go od  sh oped 01:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that's 151.67.87.93. Should be good now. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|25px]] Watched. - Go od  sh oped 01:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Good. Let's go now. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * (Play welcome to the jungle by Guns 'n' roses). - Go od  sh oped 02:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Still hasn't done anything...yet. Hopefully it made Giove so mad he decided to leave...or create another puppet. It's a little too quiet right now, don't you agree? --Gp75motorsports (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope, here he goes. He's up to it again. I'll be back with a link to the page. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

(undent) OK. - Go od  sh oped 23:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Here it is. This is Giove's edit. He has been restricted to one edit per week per article. He has just shattered this restriction, making eight

edits to this article IN ONE DAY. Should I report him to an admin, you think? --Gp75motorsports (talk) 23:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Heck yeah! Go to WP:ANI right now. I'll back you up if they start thinking you're silly. - Go od  sh oped 23:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ho yeah! Looks like this is going to be accepted by ARBCOM. Well, that's one Giove account down, one to go. This is getting easy, I think. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * And by the way, you see that warning below on my talk page? That user has been harassing me and trolling on my talk page. He has also been attacking me on his user space. Check the diff links on his userspace. Good luck. - Go  od  sh oped
 * Yeah, I see. I'll undo any attacks he makes. And speaking of userpages, check this out. The Transhumanist remade it. Pretty cool, huh? --Gp75motorsports (talk) 02:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was looking at the effort. Pretty cool, by the way. - Go od  sh oped 02:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And as for StopTaoSpam, I added a warning to his page. I won't be able to report him immediately-I'm going with 3RR for now so I don't get blocked myself. You understand. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

(undent) Yep. - Go od  sh oped 02:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

RFCN
Hey Good, I removed your report to WP:RFCN about ه٥ا٥ر because s/he hasn't edited yet. They only need to be reported there if they disregard your username concern and continue to edit. The reason for this is because the user may have seen your concern and agreed with it, and decided to abandon the account and create a new one. I agree it's sort of an odd name, and the editor may want to consider a change. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Dude, that Brian guy was not vandalizing the Splinter Cell page
He was fixing the page. You obviously don't know how to be a moderator. The IP guy 142.33.82.85 was the vandal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.122.31 (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete?
Why am I being nom. for deletion? I will not be able to responed untill tommorow around 9 am. thanks--Greenwood1010 (talk) 23:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC) Am i being deleted because I have too much stuff on my user page? I removed most of it if that was the problem...please don't delete me!--Greenwood1010 (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia.  Marlith  T / C  05:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|33px]] This is a warning concerning your agressive actions toward me and perceived attack per your revert and your actions here. As an editor seeking administrator here.  You are not beyond the fundamental rules of wikipedia.  For example ERR and Civility when you proceeded to Report Me.  You quote "StopTaoSpam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) — Violation of username policy because: Is an attack on an specific user, includes profanities, obscenities, or references to genitalias or sexual slangs, matches the name of a company or group, promotes a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view, is defamatory or insulting to other people or groups, invokes the name of a religious figure/religion in a distasteful, disrespectful, or provocative way, or promotes one religion over another, refers to a violent real-world action, and refers or includes allusions to racism, sexism, hate speech, et cetera; User was removing links that were possibly spam, but also was kind of directing a personal attack on the Taos.. -Goodshoped 04:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)".

Please be aware in reference to the External links you stated first than last which is a contradiction. You quote "All the links seem OK, neutral, educational, and verifiable." yet you list nothing else. Please be aware this article falls on the grounds of religious articles and more information can be found here external links Specifically in the section Links normally to be avoided. You listed NPV yet you list no reason. External links should comply with reliable sources and must comply with Verificability. As this was a Laozi article you did not list exceptions to and.

Please be aware finally of Policies and guidelines specifically your comment "All the links seem OK, neutral, educational, and verifiable." does not comply with consensus. If external links are removed in the future by a registered user please do not revert it as it is not in consensus and I am disputing it. For your information. I have a right to my userspace. I have already removed elements that offended you though policy allows me to proceed on disputes on my userpage. I did not notify you (I wasn't aware I needed to) as I needed to prepare a suitable case that would pass NPV (It was the holidays) This is considerably difficult considering certain facts may appear malicious when it was not attended to and I was not prepared for a formal approach nor was I aware you were monitoring my own userspace. I will reference this and finish my final conflict resolution by the end of this week should you wish to continue with your actions.StopTaoSpam (talk) 10:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

What?
Dude, what? Jmlk 1  7  11:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, that? That was when the vandals were up, so I kind of made a joke. I apologize if I offended you in any way. - Go od  sh oped 22:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Lol, they do tend to open up a bit. No worries about me; takes a lot to offend me, but not sure about others.  :)  Jmlk  1  7  00:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * They're all OK. (I hope.) - Go od  sh oped 00:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

User page design center
I got your message about your userpage. You can do-it-yourself by following the instructions at the User page design center.

It's easy!

The Transhumanist (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, sweet, thanks! - Go od  sh oped 00:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Re. Someone's been harassing me...
Hello Goodshoped35110s. I am sorry, but I am extremely busy at this time and can't give proper attention to your request now as it requires some investigation. I suggest that you take this situation to WP:ANI. Otherwise, I'll get back to it tomorrow. Best regards, Hús  ö  nd  02:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I will. - Go od  sh oped 02:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * On quick examination, it appears you touched a nerve with that editor. I've noticed (and commented) that your reports to WP:UAA are a touch ... injudicious at times.  A gentler question  template would probably have been better, but might have gotten a similar reaction. I'll have a word with him/her when I get the chance - busy off-wiki tonight.    Acroterion  (talk)  02:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I heard. (Not like heard heard, but ANI heard.) - Go od  sh oped 02:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Declined again; try WP:RFCN if it's important to you, but I'd really just suggest you stay away from this particular user; I think you're both editing in good faith, but not very compatible.  Acroterion  (talk)  03:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm watching the discussion. The RFCN report got removed by one of the editors. - Go od  sh oped 03:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * We're almost at a conclusion, I think. In fact, a short block is inducing a name change.      Acroterion  (talk)  04:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

(undent) I've been watching the discussion ever since this escalated. And I am willing to stop attacking him if he is willing to stop attacking me. - Go od  sh oped 04:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we could block him for a day or two and have him return. That should cool him down and be more civil toward you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlith (talk • contribs) 04:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You may want to check the ANI entry here. - Go od  sh oped 05:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Brief blocks solely for the purpose of "cooling down" an angry user should not be used, as they inevitably serve to inflame the situation.  Daniel  05:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I know. - Go od  sh oped 05:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * What Daniel said. Blocks rarely have a cooling effect in such cases: quite the opposite. For your part, here's an opportunity to be magnanimous.    Acroterion  (talk)  05:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I didn't really agree to the cool-down block. He may, however, should cool off here. - Go od  sh oped 05:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not!  Marlith  T / C  05:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Somehow, I don't think he'll appreciate the joke.   Acroterion  (talk)  05:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

But you should watch out when putting the tags; he's dangerous? - Go od  sh oped 05:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No. But he doesn't share your sense of humor. So, as of now, drop the whole issue/discussion.    Acroterion  (talk)  05:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't want him to make a big fuss about it, in fact, once he gets renamed, he'll probably go to Arbcom and try to Arbitrate us all. - Go od  sh oped 05:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

HELPME!!!
- Go od  sh oped 06:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If someone has started an RfAr against you, I think the best thing to do is go along with the process, and explain clearly what you have done, and what they have done. I'm unfamiliar with the specifics of the process, but basically be honest, and back up your claims with diffs - you should be fine. Dihydrogen Monoxide  ♫ 07:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * As far as I can tell, no one has requested arbitration involving you. Perhaps you were mistaken? --Sopoforic (talk) 07:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ryulong removed the RfAr that an IP posted; presumably it was the former StopTaoSpam. Since there was no RfC or mediation first, nothing's going to happen at RfAr.  Settle down!.  Stop with the comments and running-around-declaring-an-emergency.   Acroterion  (talk)  12:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Leave the former StopTaoSpam alone. There is no reason to interact, nor to ask for the userpage to be deleted.    Acroterion  (talk)  01:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I will. That's why...wait, is the thing archived yet? - Go od  sh oped 01:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

your EfD
Please go to your EfD. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I heard. - Go od  sh oped 05:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)