User talk:Goodsmudge/Avatar2

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was procedural close. Per Requested moves, this isn't the right procedure for "publishing" userspace drafts. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Goodsmudge/Avatar2 → Avatar 2 –
 * It has been developed in my userspace and I now think that the article should be moved to the mainspace so that others users can edit it. Goodsmudge(Talk) 10:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose. According to WP:NFF we should not create articles on future/incomplete films until the start of principal photography has been confirmed. Favonian (talk) 12:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose from a procedural standpoint. The Avatar 2 article already has a long page history, or rather edit conflicts, of going back and forth between an actual article and a redirect. Even if the WP:NFF issues were resolved, I don't think a page move would be warranted here -- but rather the normal regular method of a user using his sandbox as draft space, then copying and pasting it to the existing article. Otherwise you'll just erase the existing page history of the already created page. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose. There's less information here than in Avatar (2009 film) (the current redirect target).  So long as that's the case, the latter link serves readers far better.  Powers T 01:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Once again

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Per Requested moves, this isn't the right procedure for "publishing" userspace drafts. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Armbrust The Homunculus 16:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Goodsmudge/Avatar2 → Avatar 2
 * The main evidence:


 * imdb.com
 * wikidata.org/
 * Thank you for your attention! --► Cekli 829  19:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Both IMDB.com and wikidata.org are generally not considered very good reliable sources. See WP:USERGENERATED regarding IMDB.com. Wikidata is a Wikimedia Foundation website (therefore making it a sister site of Wikipedia), thus for all practical purposes makes it fall under WP:CIRCULAR, WP:WITS, WP:WINARS, and the like guidelines and essays. Zzyzx11 (talk) 00:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.