User talk:Goodtimber

Category discussion
Hi, since this looks like your first discussion on a category renaming here I would recommend changing your "Keep as is" to Oppose, as you are opposing my suggested change. Thanks for your comment (even in opposition to my change idea) :)  C t j f 8 3 Talk 02:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing out my mismanagement of words. I was thinking in AfD-speak, not CfD-speak. &mdash;Goodtimber (walk/talk) 03:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I guess two other users have "keep" also, although I think "oppose" is a better word. Good job on striking out your old "keep as is" comment, I forgot to tell you that!! Good work! :)  C t j f 8 3 Talk 03:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Jupiter template
I edited the "Major moons" link so that it only links to "Galilean moons"  Serendi pod ous  14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's what I was thinking! I'm glad I wasn't too far off base. &mdash;Goodtimber (walk/talk) 16:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured topic candidates/Everglades/archive2
Has your oppose been resolved yet? I'd like to make a decision on the outcome soon. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Next Generation Science Standards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSTA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Next Gen Science Standards
Glad you're looking at the Next Gen Science Standards. I'll help keep an eye on the space; working to improve articles related to the history of learning standards, including the Committee of Ten at the moment. Daveplml (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Plate boundary diagrams
Hi, you contacted me on my [|talk page] on Wikimedia Commons and asked to be contacted via Wikipedia about creating diagrams for divirgent and transform plate boundaries for your outside school in California. I'd be happy to try and make these, and please do keep pestering me to do so if I don't deliver. Really glad you took an interest in my illustrations - now to try and relearn how to use Inkscape ;P Domdomegg (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you new friend! &mdash;Goodtimber (walk/talk) 19:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi I think I've done them, please check and tell me if anything should be improved (especially about the C-C constructive boundary, not sure really if it's supposed to look like that). Also if you need anything else done please do tell me. Domdomegg (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature also has a missing end tag from  not closed inside the Wikilink.

You are encouraged to change
 * : &mdash;Goodtimber (walk/talk)

to
 * :  Goodtimber (walk/talk)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 02:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)