User talk:Googgoollman7777

Welcome!
Hello, Googgoollman7777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to November 13. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dan653 (talk) 17:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 1997, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  23:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Year articles
Please do not create year articles with only templates for content. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please also discuss first at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years, as there are some intricate templates that need to be modified. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 01:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * And remember to alphabetize the names you add to the existing lists. Quis separabit?  12:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Decade date formatting
Most of the 21st century decades have the template use mdy dates, which indicates that consensus has been obtained for mdy dates (August 12, 2005), rather than dmy dates (12 August 2005). In any case, you shouldn't change date formats, per MOS:DATEVAR, unless required through MOS:DATEUNIFY, MOS:DATETIES, or per WP:CONSENSUS. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

War editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sandbox, you may be blocked from editing.

January 2021
Hi Googgoollman7777! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DavidLee200 (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Oxford comma
I see that you have added a serial comma to several articles. Wikipedia has no preference between the two styles. Although you are welcome to apply your personal preference when adding new content, please do not change the form of standard English adopted by an article without good reason. Certes (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Red links
Hiya! I note you like to remove red links. But our editing guideline here is "Do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject." --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 19:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi – can I please just add my voice to the request that you do not indiscriminately remove redlinks? Here's pointing out the guideline to you on the 3rd, but here you are on the 8th still doing it. The crucial bit is where it says Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject – I don't think this is always met by your redlink deletions, certainly not by the one I just reverted, and I think you need to approach it with more care and make your case ... the edit summary redlink, on its own, just looks to me like a flag for a problem because it may suggest that the editor hasn't understood policy. Sorry to hector you but I hope this helps. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The next step is that we'll be blindly reverting all such edits from you; I don't think you want that. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 21:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, a better idea. I've blocked you solely to get your attention.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 01:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)