User talk:Googlemycrib

Spam in User:Googlemycrib
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Googlemycrib, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Googlemycrib is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Googlemycrib, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of GoogleMyCrib
A tag has been placed on GoogleMyCrib, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Politizer talk / contribs 08:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Spam
What perverted logic led you to leave a message for me on Myspace? (You are actually very lucky to get a prompt response - I very rarely visit my Myspace page.)

"As far as I know we have the right just as anyone else to set up shop on the free wikipedia." No. No. No. Nobody has a right to set up shop on Wikipedia. It is an encyclopedia. All submissions must be notable and preferably submitted by people with no COI. See also WP:SPAM. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, Googlemycrib...if you want to be blaming someone for your articles being deleted, you should blame me, since I am the one who nominated them for deletion. RHaworth and the other administrators who deleted your articles are just following Wikipedia policy, and don't deserve to be harrassed. Politizer talk / contribs 08:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)