User talk:Googol30

Hello, If you haven't yet done so, please read my main user page before posting here. Please note that if I comment on something, please respond to it there so there aren't cross links making everything more difficult and confusing than it has to be. Otherwise, feel free to comment, and, if you don't mind, give me an article or two to read up on if you think I am not adequately knowledgeable about a topic. Thanks. Googol30 (talk) 20:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Googol30! Thank you for your contributions. I am GimliDotNet and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! GimliDotNet (talk) 20:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Boltzmann equation
Hi could you please be more specific on which bits are confusing/difficult to understand? Please feel free to discuss on the talk page there, preferably not here or mine, so we can keep it all in the one and right place. Thanks. =) F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 09:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saleen S281, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=503739238 here]. A520 &#124;   Talk me away! / sign it! 09:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Would you please look more closely at what you are reverting, as you have just reverted the 27 time copied and pasted vandalism back into the article and have wrongly warned a user about what they have done. In fact, it should not only be the original producer of the vandalism, but you as well who should be warned and "learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia". Googol30 (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Could you please wikify and correct my errors on Code_Aster ? Thanks.
Hi,

I just created the Code_Aster page, mostly a copy of the French version. It's an open-source simulation software (and not a small one, it' developed since 1989 by the national electricity company of France). I certainly made some mistakes and improper formating. So if you could have a look. Thanks.

YannickPatois (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The linked article has been deleted before I could get a chance to look at it, and you've never touched the draft so are you still looking for help with anything? Googol30 (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

PROD AccessApps
I noticed you've done some work on AccessApps. I'm just letting you know that I've proposed that this article be deleted.CircleGirl (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Where's the relevant AfD? Googol30 (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, it seems I'm not familiar with the different deletion processes. Carry on. Googol30 (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.


 * Yey! Googol30 (talk) 02:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

"5 demands" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 5 demands. Since you had some involvement with the 5 demands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed,Rosguill talk 00:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Danese Cooper, WP:BLP, WP:CIRCULAR
The source you added] to Danese Cooper when you restored her date of birth to the article appears to be a mirror of the text from the the same Wikipedia article. As such, it was a WP:CIRCULAR reference and an exceptionally bad choice of a source to back up a WP:DOB, especially with an editor with as much experience as you and a member of WikiProject_Citation_cleanup.

We could also do without the snarky attitude, kids. Toddst1 (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Wow. In my rush to find confirming information, I completely overlooked the rest of the content on that page. I have since found a non-circular reference that I hope is more satisfactory. Googol30 (talk) 21:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your best efforts here but a birth index falls under WP:PRIMARYCARE.  Toddst1 (talk) 22:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
I see you recently accepted a pending change to February 25 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for informing me! I'll be more strict on source requirements from now on. Googol30 (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of BIPS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BIPS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BIPS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melmann 12:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Copeland's method
Thanks for you recent edit. I rewrote this page a few weeks ago, and another editor RobLa took exception to my wording, making changes of his own (which I in turn object to). There’s been no consensus, just his view against mine. Your specific comment about ‘some people’ refers to one of his changes, but I don’t know whether your ‘several more places’ refer to my own contribution or to his edits. If you could be more specific, it would resolve the consensus one way or the other. Colin.champion (talk) 08:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Eleventh anniversary on Wikipedia!

 * I didn't realize it's been so long. Googol30 (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Anarcho-monarchism
Hello, Googol30

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Anarcho-monarchism, created by you. Your comments are welcome at.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)