User talk:Gordon313


 * You're not making a good case for yourself when you remove the declined unblock box that features, in bold text, "Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked." —C.Fred (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * No way, with this editing record. David J Johnson (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

You're Not an Administrator David


 * No, but he raises a valid point. With your editing record, what confidence do we have that your future edits would be constructive? —C.Fred (talk) 21:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

You all have a lot of confidence that the edits will be constructive.

Sorry but I don't have all day
Want to be unblocked but I don't have all day to wait for a decision

Now Listen I want to be unblocked I have already said  I was willing to be a constructive editor and you C.Fred don't have to have an attitude. There are other things that I can do other than edit Wikipedia and all I asked was to be unblocked now loose the attitude.

And yes being a Constructive editor. Again I'm willing to do that.

Talk page access revoked. Your behaviour here shows we should probably extend the block, but instead I'm giving you time to cool off and consider whether you want to be a productive editor here, instead of your current behaviour. --Yamla (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Since you are attempting to evade your block by editing without logging in, I am extending the duration of your block. —C.Fred (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced we're dealing with Special:Contributions/75.166.126.227 here. I've had several long conversations with this editor in the #wikipedia-en-unblock IRC channel and see no reason to believe their apologies are sincere. Vandalism-only account; block extended to indefinite. Huon (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)