User talk:Gordonap

Welcome... Hello, Gordonap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. In addition: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Peter Stuyvesant. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Again, welcome! &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 11:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

AfC
You have not yet made 500 edits in the article namespace and are therefore unqualified to be an Articles for Creation reviewer. I have removed you from our participant list. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Gordonap (talk) 16:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

From the user page
You have requested review of the article on the 1991 immigration act. I cannot find the article in question; could you please give me the actual title of the article in question? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this is the correct place to respond as I have been making minor edits to Wikipedia for a few years, but haven't been involved in reviewing previously. The article is the 1991 Armed Forces Immigration Adjustment Act. It was removed as a fake article because it was cut and pasted (from my student's word document) but it is a well-researched article without any copyright violations that I believe would be a helpful contribution to Wikipedia users. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:1991_Armed_Forces_Immigration_Adjustment_Act Thanks  Gordonap (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Part of the problem was that the article was created in user-space rather than in article-space. I have now corrected this and inserted the article where it should be.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I hadn't realized this. I'll make sure that I check this in future when students are working on Wikipedia. Gordonap (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * "when students are working on Wikipedia" ??
 * We have an outreach program specifically for professors and their students. I encourage you to take the online training so your course's interaction with Wikipedia can be both tracked and enhanced by our active collaboration with you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

This is really helpful. I think I may have started doing this before the training existed and I have gradually developed my assignment to include more guidance, including a class workshop in which we upload the entries, discussion about wikipedia guidelines, etc. ... but this will save me a lot of time! I realize that entries can still be uneven, but this looks really helpful. I will definitely use it in future. Gordonap (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * To expand slightly on my earlier comment; if an article is posted as if the subject were a user (e.g. user:1991 immigration act) then one cannot find the title unless the word "user" is included in the search. Hence my initial difficulty in finding the article in question. It is also true that pages which appear to be user pages but which contain information not directly related to Wikipedia are customarily deleted, with only rare exceptions. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinese Students in the United States has been accepted
 Chinese Students in the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Oo7565 (talk) 18:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Gordonap help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Ellen Bamford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angel Island. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thanks for the message: you are right ... I had no idea that I was linking to a disambiguation page. I changed the link, but noticed that the Ellis Island link is constructed differently, with a disambiguation link under the reference to the immigration station. I would guess that the vast majority of researchers are interested in the Angel Island immigration station and would benefit from the Angel Island page being constructed in the same way. Just a suggestion! Thanks again.Gordonap (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Judge Lacombe
Thank you for your contributions to the Emile Lacombe article and the rest of Wikipedia. I wanted to follow up on your edit summary regarding his assignment to the Second Circuit. Lacombe, like all U.S. circuit judges who were sitting at the time, immediately became a judge of the new Court of Appeals pursuant to Section 2 of the Evarts Act. However, Lacombe continued to sit concurrently on the existing Circuit Court until 1911, when the Circuit Courts were abolished and their remaining trial jurisdiction was transferred to the District Courts. This is consistent with Lacombe's Federal Judicial Center biographical database page, here. I hope this clarifies, but if you have any questions or any ideas how this can best be expressed in the article please let me know. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First interracial kiss in film (October 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Omni Flames was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:First interracial kiss in film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Omni Flames ( talk ) 23:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bruce Yamashita
 * added a link pointing to Constitutional Convention


 * McCarthyism
 * added a link pointing to Senator McCarthy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chinese students in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chinese students in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chinese students in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 04:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:First interracial kiss in film concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:First interracial kiss in film, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:First interracial kiss in film


Hello, Gordonap. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First interracial kiss in film".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)