User talk:Goretti Cortina

EAS
Hi, thanks for email. I have deleted the article again.
 * The article was largely copied from the EAS website, which not only asserts copyright but threatens legal action against unauthorised use. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as describedhere; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.
 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. In fact it had no reference section at all.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ''is the voice of sports and recreational aviation in Europe... therefore represents the interests of an estimated 650.000 sports and recreational aviation active participants
 * The content gives little attention to notability, and largely a string of promotional aims, mission statements, POV claims and the like  objective is the long-term promotion and protection... association’s mission is to represent the interests... supports a European regulatory environment that is proportionate... minimal amount of regulation to ensure flight safety, access to airspace, free movement and efficient and cost-effective organisation for operations, are of paramount importance for air sports to survive and thrive... EAS takes the view that the developing European regulatory framework for civil aviation should allow for the continuation of all flying activities, which are currently possible under national legislation.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject (...our members...) Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See alsoBest practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)