User talk:GorleyWiki

Talkback
... disco spinster   talk  17:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, HourlyNerd. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 16:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

HourlyNerd
Please stop playing these childish games. The notability threshold for companies is detailed in WP:ORG. "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Your request for formal mediation will very likely be denied because it's clear the issue is you not being familiar with our guidelines. Also, please read our conflict of interest guideline. --Neil N  talk to me 16:40, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to HourlyNerd has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: HourlyNerd was changed by GorleyWiki (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918718 on 2014-10-30T21:45:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

HourlyNerd
If you edit this article again, either under your account or anonymously, I will block you indefinitely. It has been explained repeatedly to you why your argument for the removal of the article is invalid, so I will not rehash that here. You have a chance to contribute to other areas of the encyclopedia if you so wish. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion policy
It appears that you haven't had Wikipedia's deletion policy explained to you in much detail. So, here it is:Deletion policy. Read it through, carefully, because from now on, people are going to assume you know it. Cheers, VeryCrocker (talk) 09:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)