User talk:Gorrister

Hi - I made some changes to the Pete Rose article, so let me know what you think. My personal belief is that the statistics table (like the one on Hank Aaron's page) take up more page space than they're worth, as links to Baseball-Reference.com and other sites can provide the same info (and with better linking on their side); I just think the page space could be put to much better use, especially with someone like this where there's a       be said. MisfitToys 00:07, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)


 * I've never actually received a message. I appreciate the changes you made.  I liked the look of the Aaron page - the one I'm currently revamping as we speak.  You make a good point about links to other sites might be a better suggestion.  I'm fairly new at this so I didn't want to undo somebody else's hard work and thought the information was relevent.  The other reason I went with this is becase the WikiProject Baseball players suggested it and so I went with it.  They seem to fallen down on the job.  I'm will to go either way.  Have you looked at the Aaron page yet?  Would you take out all the statistics?  I particularly don't like the yearly league leadership rankings but didn't want to delete and have somebody get        off.  Let me know what you think so I make the Aaron changes (and Rose changes) tomorrow.  Thanks for taking the time to let me know what you thing - By the way - how do you get the time of your edit to show up automatically? Gorrister


 * Just sign your messages with four consecutive ~ marks, and the timestamp will appear automatically. MisfitToys 02:45, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

VFD nominations
Your recent VFD nominations weren't in the correct form. They were missing the requisite header. Please read WP:GVFD. Uncle G 18:23, 2005 Mar 28 (UTC)

Moe Berg
Wow! My first reaction was that there is too much in the Moe Berg article now - that sports stuff is so detailed I'm not sure how many non-baseball-fanatics will get through it. What's interesting about Berg, after all, isn't his sports career but everything else. On reflection, though, I think the introduction and headers are well done enough to (a) pique the casual reader's interest and (b) let them find the parts they want. So well done!

And in response to the message above this one, I'm having trouble figuring out how to do VFD these days, too! It used to be so easy. - DavidWBrooks 19:40, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comments. The baseball stuff might be a little too indepth I'll admit, but I wouldn't want to shorten it too much more.  His life in the spy business was really interesting and the stuff after the war was just plain old sad.  So much outside of his baseball career seems kind of nebulous and unverifiable (the stories of the Doolittle raid for example) that at least with the baseball stuff, I know they are 100% verifiable. Gorrister 20:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Moe Berg and the State Department
Thank you for the kind words about my edits. I think you must have missed though, that I actually took that bit about the State Department back out in the middle of my series of edits. I did find one source that mentioned that, but then realized my other sources did not so I removed it. If I missed a reference you can feel free to take it out, but I thought it was already gone. Indrian 13:38, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Accidental removal of nomination 80.58.11.45
Sorry. That was an accident - I had no intention of removing that. There was an error message when I attempted to save an edit on a different user and I saved it a second time. Apparently, this overwrote your entry re: 80.58.11.45.
 * WCFrancis 20:40, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Pete Rose
What were you trying to do with this edit that was marked minor: ? It left the template broken and the word "       " was replaced with spaces multiple times. &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 23:40, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC) Ah, okay, I understand. Keep contributing! &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 03:51, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. We have cyber sitter at home and it wasn't disabled when I made my changes.  It will filter out any words that it deems inappropriate -          - being one of them. Gorrister 12:09, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sandy Koufax
I will give it a look sometime in the next few days. Indrian 23:46, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

Crazy Horse
Thanks for the compliment on the rewrite and for doing the copy edit. I should have taken more time to review my changes, but I'd been looking at it so long that when I read it I kept scanning over the mistakes. Gorrister 15:12, 11 May 2005 (UTC)


 * You are most welcome, Gorrister! I miss a lot of things when I read my own writing, too. --sparkit (talk) 18:51, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Infobox
Thanks, just trying to standardise everything - spread the love by applying similar changes if you see an out-of-place infobox. ed g2s &bull;  talk  13:00, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * You might be interested in this dicussion: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life/taxobox_usage ed g2s  &bull;  talk  13:05, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Hello. Some of us, including me and Googie man, have been discussing the creation of a Baseball portal (see Wikiportal). Would you be interested in helping out on this? Danny 23:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Very much so. What do I need to do? Gorrister 00:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Cfd:Controversial books
Could you take a look at the Cfd you made? I think you've misunderstood the category and what the word "Controversial" means. It is not hard to establish whether a book was sufficiently "controversial", i.e. that it generated controversy. And it is not necessarily a negative term -- the Bible is/was controversial, the Koran is/was controversial, the Origin of Species is/was controversial, Machiavelli's The Prince is/was controversial. It has no bearing on their validity -- more than anything else, it means the book had an impact of some sort, it generated discussion, disagreement, assent, etc! If you could reconsider this, I would very much appreciate it, I think it is a useful and interesting category. Thank you. --Fastfission 04:41, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/Karl Scherer
Please note that there are issues with the "6500 google hits", now explained at the VfD. It is possible this would have a substantial effect on your choice of voting. 22:05, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Last Laugh
Hey...just curious why you changed Last Laugh (M*A*S*H episode) so that in the episode template the characters the actors played are no longer listed next to the names of the actors.

I don't want to start a revert war, so perhaps if you and I (as we seem to be the only ones really doing anything) can come to a consensus either way it'd be really great. Thanks! Kurt Weber 7 July 2005 02:16 (UTC)


 * Hi, I did it for consistancy sake - the ones already done for the first season didn't have them in the episode template. Also, because of the size of the box, the names always wrap and, in my opinion, don't look as good.  But, if you feel that they really need to be there then we can find a way to put it in and still look good.  Gorrister 7 July 2005 10:15 (UTC)


 * Well, I think the very concept of having articles on individual shows (no matter how influential or important the series was) is only borderline encyclopedic--it's inside that line, but it's close to breaking it. However, if you're going to have articles on the show and list the guest stars (important information that BELONGS in such an article), then I think it's also important to know who they played--especially with M*A*S*H, where the guest stars always played such an important part of the plot. Kurt Weber 7 July 2005 16:25 (UTC)


 * I agree that the information should be provided, and it is. In the second paragraph of the overview section is where I've been putting a list of guest stars and the parts they played.  If you want to just include it in the information box, then I think the box needs to be wider so that at least some of the names and characters don't wrap. Gorrister 7 July 2005 16:30 (UTC)


 * That's true, but that wouldn't be the only information in the infobox that's duplicated in the overview section--there's the writers and director, broadcast number and date, and the names of the guest stars themselves. I think for consistency's sake, we should either duplicate everything or nothing at all. Kurt Weber 7 July 2005 18:01 (UTC)


 * OK, I've made a couple of minor changes to the episode template that I think makes it look better if the character names are included. What do you thing? Gorrister 7 July 2005 18:23 (UTC)

Bonus baby
The Wikimedia Foundation just received an email from the co-owner of Hardball Times saying that the text in the Wikipedia article Bonus baby was lifted from http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/cash-in-the-cradle-the-bonus-babies/. I have commented out the alleged copyright violation awaiting either a rewrite by you or an explanation. If you rewrite the text, make sure to cite the source given above as the reference used (See Cite sources). You can use other websites and sources as references, but copying the copyrighted work of others is not permitted. Please see this as a learning experience. --mav 17:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Sgtslaughter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sgtslaughter.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use  .)  If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Evil Monkey&#8756;Hello 09:41, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * I noticed that you removed the no source tag from Image:Sgtslaughter.jpg but did not add any source. Please note that any unsourced will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded. Also Jimbo has said that people continue to upload unsourced images "should be blocked from editing, as they represent a legal risk to the project and are not behaving in an intellectually responsible manner. Evil Monkey&#8756;Hello 21:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:PeteRose4192Hit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PeteRose4192Hit.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or fairuse. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Note that the same applies to Image:Peterose.jpg and Image:PeteRoseSlide.jpg as well --Pak21 09:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

M*A*S*H Wiki
You may be interested in http://mash.wikicities.org Kurt Weber 03:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cobb_coke_ad.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cobb_coke_ad.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 03:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Ru_mes.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ru_mes.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:31, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Diocesan Infobox
To the creators of Diocesan/Archdiocesan articles

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

Sandy Koufax FAR
Sandy Koufax has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Stoney&MeatloafCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stoney&MeatloafCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 14:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:MASH-episode1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MASH-episode1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:TKLC Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TKLC Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SandyKoufax1955Card.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SandyKoufax1955Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:BaltimoreBlackSox1923logo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BaltimoreBlackSox1923logo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:BirminghamBlackBaron1923.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BirminghamBlackBaron1923.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Barstow copyright
Some text you contributed to Evel Knievel appeared on another content side prompting some copyvio concerns. Some discussion has taken place at Talk:Evel Knievel about this. If you could attest to the origin of the material, that might be helpful. The material of concern originated in a very extensive edit you supplied in which you cited three new references. MaxEnt 05:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Requiem for a Lightweight
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Requiem for a Lightweight, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Requiem for a Lightweight. Oo7565 (talk) 20:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AtlantaBlackCrackers1932.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AtlantaBlackCrackers1932.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AtlanticCityBacharachGiantsLogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AtlanticCityBacharachGiantsLogo.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:MoeBergPrinceton.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MoeBergPrinceton.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. StewieGriffin!  &bull; Talk Sign 20:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ClevelandBuckeyesLogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:ClevelandBuckeyesLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pilot (M*A*S*H)
I have nominated Pilot (M*A*S*H), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Pilot (M*A*S*H). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bananas, Crackers and Nuts
I have nominated Bananas, Crackers and Nuts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bananas, Crackers and Nuts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThuranX (talk) 02:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Yankee Doodle Doctor
I have nominated Yankee Doodle Doctor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Yankee Doodle Doctor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThuranX (talk) 02:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chief Surgeon Who?
I have nominated Chief Surgeon Who?, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chief Surgeon Who?. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThuranX (talk) 02:52, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Requiem for a Lightweight
I have nominated Requiem for a Lightweight, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Requiem for a Lightweight. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThuranX (talk) 02:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Norman_Rockwell_-_The_Rookie.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Norman_Rockwell_-_The_Rookie.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sherool (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:M*A*S*H navigation
Template:M*A*S*H navigation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Gorrister! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Maxine Allen -
 * 2) Jim Beatty -
 * 3) Bill Brooks (coach) -
 * 4) Vic Bubas -
 * 5) Al Buehler -
 * 6) Marge Burns -
 * 7) Lou Johnson -
 * 8) Jane Leavy -

File source problem with File:3rdMarineDivision.gif
Thank you for uploading File:3rdMarineDivision.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stoney&MeatloafCover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Stoney&MeatloafCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DodgeCityPoliceCommission.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DodgeCityPoliceCommission.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:WilburBestwick.gif
Thank you for uploading File:WilburBestwick.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox Negro League franchise
Template:Infobox Negro League franchise has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox baseball team. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:05, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox Negro League franchise
Template:Infobox Negro League franchise has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox baseball team. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TKLC Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TKLC Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)