User talk:Goryeobangja

Welcome!

Hello, Goryeobangja, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Evawen (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

inciting subversion of state power
Dear Goryeobangja

Thank you for working on that article. However there are some problems with the edit related to wikipedia policy, especially 'no original research'. you have written that the US Code is similar to the Chinese Law, that is fascinating but not really fitting in with wikipedia style. if you can find some reputable author who has made this comparison, it would be much much more in keeping with wikipedia style to describe the arguments the author makes, an quote from the US code within this context. if you could find some secondary sources regaring a similarity between US code and Chinese code it would be very helpful. another missing element is the de-facto use of the Chinese code to imprison human rights activists, whereas no such activity, that i am aware of, nor that you have listed in your posting, makes the assertion that the US government has imprisoned anyone for speaking against it, while specifically citing that section of US law. if you believe this to be true, then it would actually be better to 1. make that a separate article, and then 2. link to that article from the 'inciting subversion...' article, under 'see also' or 'comparison with US law' mini-section. thats my opinion, anyways, please feel free to consult others an discuss this. thank you. Decora (talk) 03:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * yes. it is not fitting the style of wikipedia to write one's personal observations on the subject being written about. this is the WP:OR policy. it is much more 'wikipedia style' to describe what experts and journalists have said on the subject. this is the issue with the 'inciting subversion' article. thank you. Decora (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)