User talk:Gossg

Welcome
Hello  & Wilkommen! Welkom! Bienvenue! Benvenuti! ようこそ! Välkommen! Witamy! Bem-vindo(a)! ¡Bienvenido! Добро пожаловать! 欢迎! Basically, welcome to Wikipedia!  Click here to respond to this message  Thank you for your helpful contributions.  Mae din \talk 07:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey Greg, thanks for the message! I have the article Battery (electricity) watchlisted, and I saw your edit there.  I just happened to notice that your talk page was red-linked, and so I peeked at the rest of your contributions and left you a welcome, ;-)  We all get our edits reversed sometimes, don't worry too much about it.  The important thing is to take on-board any helpful comments made at the time.  A lot of edits will get reversed because they aren't backed up by a reliable source: it's one of those things that helps make Wikipedia readable!  It's a good thing, but I appreciate that sometimes it's frustrating, especially for new users.  But you're doing well, actually!  By the way, if you hadn't noticed, the "Beta" version includes a new, enhanced "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" editing format.  I haven't really tried it myself, but I understand that you can click (for example) the "italic" button, and it will put the mark-up in for you.  Maybe you'd like to try the Beta and see if the new toolbar helps you with the (often confusing) wiki mark-up!  Keep up the good work, Greg, :-)   Mae din \talk 19:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Question at Requests for feedback
To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what you are asking here, but if you are asking if you have to do anything at Requests for feedback to close the question, the answer is no. We'll take care of it.

Thanks for your contribution.-- SPhilbrick  T  22:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Feedback archived
Hi there.

A while ago, you requested feedback in WP:FEED. Because it has been a while, and you'd received at least some response there, I have now archived the replies in Requests for feedback/Archive/27. Please do not edit that page though; if you require further feedback, add a new request on WP:FEED.

I am trying to clear the backlogs; it would help us a lot if you could look at the requests from other users on WP:FEED and add any comments to help them out. Anyone can respond there, so please do take a look, and comment on the articles from other people.

If you want help with anything at all, you could either;


 * Leave a message on my own talk page;
 * Use a - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put , and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~ at the end;
 * Talk to us live, with this or this.

The last of those is particularly useful - please try it; pop in now and say hello. Best,  Chzz  ►  02:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Mudflats (blog)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mudflats (blog), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.themudflats.net/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Question for administrator
admin help

I've spent the last two or three weeks entering the story titles and some limited reference information from a series of anthologies into a table in The Grantville Gazettes. Today, when following something, I discovered the deletion discussion for one of the volumes in that series, where someone claimed that a list of stories (he refered to them as "chapters") is a copyright violation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grantville_Gazette_IV I believe that a contents list and the other information in this table are fair use and notable. Could I have a comment from one of the experts? Would it make a difference if I asked Baen for permission to provide this list? Gossg (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)               http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grantville_Gazette_IV --Gossg (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest asking this question at Media copyright questions. It's obvious this question is languishing and there are only a limited number of people who monitor adminhelp requests. In fact, this should have been asked through helpme instead because it requires no administrative action and a wider pool of editors look at helpme requests, but I think asking it at the dedicated forum is in any event more likely to result in a timely answer.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 1635: The Papal Stakes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1635: The Papal Stakes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1635: The Papal Stakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mudflats (blog) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mudflats (blog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mudflats (blog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquis de Faux (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)