User talk:Got2Bthere

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zeena Schreck, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Naohiro19 revertvandal (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Naohiro19, thanks for this. Without specific citation I can't address which edit you felt "did not appear to be constructive"? So far, my aim has been to improve all the Wiki pages I've worked on according to verifiable research, cross-referencing, and legitimate citations on each of the subjects, as well as editing for grammar. In your talk history there are many entries from others who ask why you use auto vandal revert (revertvandal) for edits which are clearly _not_ vandalism, to which you provide no explanation. Thank you for bringing this to my attention in any case. Should you continue to auto vandal revert my edits, without helping me correct the problem by providing a clear example of _which_ edit was in question, I will indeed enquire with the necessary Wiki-authorities for ombudsman assistance.Got2Bthere (talk) 08:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
HEY, I apologise for my mistake. I normally don't undo edits made by registered edits, I click on the Pass button, but I believe I made a mistake. I just wanted to add two things:
 * For coauthors, please use the |coauthors= parameter.
 * If the source was written by the subject of the article herself, it is a primary source and hence not very reliable.

Once again, I apologise for my actions. Happy Editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, hadn't noticed this. Was trying to simply add one extra name and didn't know there was a special parameter to do so. Will try that out. Got2Bthere (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

MrOllie
My complaint with this editor is that he doesn't enter a reason for his edits.

I do think, however, that you have a legitimate complaint and should report this editor to an Ombudsman. He is contributing in a negative way.

Softtest123 (talk) 15:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Softtest123, thank you for your feedback. I agree that MrOllie's edits seem more punitive than constructive. I might still consider getting an Ombudsman's advice. First, I'm trying to locate the exact reference page or source, to be forearmed before MrOllie makes more over-zealous arguments in defense of his rash behaviour.Got2Bthere (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)