User talk:Gotogo

August 2012
Hello, I'm DBigXray. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Latin American debt crisis, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  D Big X ray  22:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Category merger
Hi, I saw that you just requested and  to be merged. Placing merge tag is, confusingly, not the way to do it. Please visit WP:CFD for the category merge process.

Thanks, Trialpears (talk) 20:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks.--Gotogo (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I am relatively new user and so I still have much to learn regarding Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Therefore I am hoping you will not mind my asking for your assistance with a question I have regarding a recent contribution you made.

In the article for the painting Model by the Wicker Chair I see you added 2 categories. I completely understand (and appreciate!) the addition of as the Munch Museum is this painting’s home museum. My question is regarding the second added category related to The Metropolitan Museum of Art. In a circumstance like this where there is a different version of the painting that is being discussed in an article, is it normal to associate the article with a category of a museum that is the home of a secondary work? Might this cause confusion with readers looking at this category page, and lead them to think the primary work is at this other museum?

Thank you for any help you can provide in educating me regarding this type of situation!
 * Hi. My understanding of practise is that its adequate to categorized several museums as I did if there are more than one version of the painting. It is not always obvious which work is the primary one. If it is obvious, for example if we talk about a sketch or a prepatory study, I wouldn't categorized it. In this case, both versions are mentioned in the article and on the museums website, so I would say both should be categorized.--Gotogo (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lion Hunt (Delacroix), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Lion_Hunt_%28Delacroix%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Lion_Hunt_%28Delacroix%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Gotogo

Thank you for creating Midsummer Dance.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)