User talk:Goturani

September 2012
Hello, I'm Trusilver. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to DVS technlogies, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Trusilver  17:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DVS Software Technlogies Pvt Ltd
Hello Goturani,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DVS Software Technlogies Pvt Ltd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to DVS Software Technologies Pvt Ltd has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  18:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to DVS Software Technologies Pvt Ltd with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Altaïr (talk) 18:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at DVS Software Technologies Pvt Ltd with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  18:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DVS Software Technologies Pvt Ltd


A tag has been placed on DVS Software Technologies Pvt Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

The article DVS Technologies has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DVS Technologies


A tag has been placed on DVS Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

On Notability
Wikipedia is not a webspace of information on every company that exists. The criteria for inclusion are at WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * In addition to that, please look at the reason for deletion. You assume it is for advertising, which might suggest to some that that is your intention. The reason given the last two times was "lack of asserted importance". In addition to the policy mentioned above, you should read WP:RS about the reliable independent sources you need to have to prove that there is notability. This is an encyclopaedia, not a directory where everyone gets in. Sorry, that's how it is. Peridon (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)