User talk:Gozalov

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hartz Chicken (October 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hartz Chicken and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hartz Chicken, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hartz_Chicken Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hartz_Chicken reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
I have revised article by adding references to it. Also extended information with additional company history.

Conflict of interest editing
Hello, Gozalov. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 00:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear @Melcous,
 * Thank you for your message regarding my recent contribution to Wikipedia. I understand your concern about conflicts of interest and want to clarify that I have no direct or indirect relationship with Lawrence Hartzog or the company he founded that I mentioned in my article. I am simply an interested contributor who has conducted extensive research and has reliable sources to support the information I provided.
 * According to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, it is only considered a conflict of interest if an editor has a personal relationship with the topic of the article, such as a financial or personal interest, or if they have been paid to edit the article. In my case, I have no such relationship, and I am not being paid for my contributions. As such, I believe I am not in conflict with the guidelines.
 * Moreover, my edits do not seek to promote, advertise or publicize anyone or anything, but rather to provide factual information that is of public interest. I have disclosed any potential conflict of interest on the talk page, as per the Wikipedia guideline.
 * In addition, I noticed that you have removed the Instagram link to the Hartz Chicken page. However, I would like to point out that KFC, a direct competitor of Hartz Chicken, has a link to their official Twitter account on their Wikipedia page. This serves as evidence that social media links are allowed on Wikipedia pages as long as they are relevant and add value to the content.
 * Lastly, I would like to bring to your attention that it appears that you have been rejecting other contributions made by other editors without just cause, and with no apparent adherence to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. This is not in line with Wikipedia's mission of providing accurate and reliable information to the public. Instead, it undermines the collaborative spirit that Wikipedia is founded upon.
 * I hope that we can work together to create an accurate and informative article about Lawrence Hartzog and Hartz Chicken that meets the high standards of Wikipedia.
 * Thank you for your time and attention.
 * Sincerely,
 * Gozalov Gozalov (talk) 16:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * thank you for your response. Can you please explain how this image is your own work if you have no connection to the subject? In terms of the instagram link, as I noted in my edit summary, please see WP:ELMINOFFICIAL which is clear that only one official link should be provided, usually the company's website. If there are multiple links on other articles they can be removed, but that is not an argument for keeping them here - see WP:OSE. Finally, if you can point to specific edits I have made that are against Wikipedia's policies and guidelines then please do so, but making general assertions as you have done above is unhelpful. I usually link to the relevant wikipedia guideline in my edit summaries as I have done on this article, which should make it clear on what basis my edits are being made. Melcous (talk) 06:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)