User talk:Gppande/Archive 5

regarding edits to article India
Hi Gaurav, Im like many other users trying to make Indian articles better and informative just as many other articles of other nations are. I felt that India article lacked detailed information and expressiveness. Any problem we can sort it out and discuss. Looking forward to hearing frm u. Cephas 405 (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

No gutts
I don't have guts to edit portal page you know how we people are (Marathi people) If I did a good thing no one will appreciate but if i did a mistake every one will criticize it and I am not admin to edit portal page. I have only 380+ edits do I am eligible for updating portal page? If yes I am ready to do it. Suyogaerospace talk to me! 03:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC) जय हींद जय महाराष्ट्र

Interested in मुंबई पोलिस
R u interested in translating Mumbai police in to मुंबई पोलिस ?? in few day I will be doing it Suyogaerospace talk to me! 03:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC) If yes check my sandbox 1 Suyogaerospace talk to me! 04:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Question
Were you User:Klopto? Just asking as a user:Save humanity currenlty blocked had referred to him as Gppande... KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 18:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey GP, user:Save humanity even copied your user page though not in a very intelligent way! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 18:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I came across user:Save humanity at Maharashtra Navnirman Sena page where he tried to add his commentry about the anti-migrant issue. -- KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 17:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

ITN, Woot!
There you go! Thanks for letting me know about the credits (I was waiting for someone to tell me I'd forgotten something, it being my first time updating ITN). :) Off to credit the article, too. -- Nataly a  20:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Hungryalism/Hungry Generation
Please try to understand that the Hungryalist movement in Bengali literature has become an important subject for researchers. But they are unable to get material except for from Little Magazine Library at Kolkata. Your understanding of Bengali literature should not be intervened by wiki guidelines. Only a few of the participants of the movement are alive who are accessible, and it is of utmost importance to bring all records to the notice of academic and non-academic researchers by linking all webpages. I am just trying to preserve lost history. NISHAD HEMBRAM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishadhembram (talk • contribs) 02:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

You might be interested
There's an ongoing discussion at WP:ANI regarding the user who vandalized your userpage by blanking it. See:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 12:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I found that.The fellow is a bastard.I know him.He stays in my nextroom.but block wont do.he made something eaero today. as told to me.even his father doesnt care him .he is 16.wanna more info?-- [+]► ▌●√Ω ЯЯΛUNΛΣ● ▌  13:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC) [+]► ▌●√Ω ЯЯΛUNΛΣ● ▌  13:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * his name is ashwanth bosswell

WP:INDIA Newsletter
Pandeji, Any plans for working on this month newsletter or we keep it bi monthly ? --  TinuCherian  (Chat?) - 15:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow! Cool ad on your userpage
Hi nice ad! BTW, I feel the recent user:Save humanity and user:Infraud issues are not connected, just a co-incidence that they happened around the same time and somehow they got associated with you. Don't worry...these things happen on WP, as you must be aware. Fuhget them! Bhaad mein jane de! BTW you can now proudly put a Userbox displaying that your userpage has been vandalized once...sadly I haven't been so lucky (with my second stint as KnowledgeHegemonyPart2)...though my userpage was vandalised one when I was user:KnowledgeHegemony...Also like Tinu asked are you coming up with a new newsletter? --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 16:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

INRConvert
Sure, I'll take a stab at that sometime this evening. Thanks AreJay (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done! Added a "k" argument to the parameter. Documentation has also been updated in the template.  Thanks AreJay (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Citations on the Mumbai page
I notice some citiation tags you've added to the Mumbai page. I would suggest that references to commonly known information that have their own articles not be tagged with the citation needed tag. It would be an overkill to tag each and every sentence, and would make reading difficult. So for example, that BCCI is headquartered in Mumbai, or that XYZ sprotsmen hail from Mumbai need no cite tags. Instead these be cited in the main article. See Citing_sources Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  15:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Brig. RD Mehta
Thanks for nominating the article. Regards, Hu114sp (talk) 04:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Where were you?
Where were you? See mumbai's talk page (Also see archives I am creating mess on it ;)) Suyogaerospace talk to me! 13:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice brain By the way call me Dark knight of mumbai or Chuck of Mumbai Suyogaerospace talk to me! 14:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Its not me thanks to my Adopter User:Mifter He mad it (Do you think a hardware guy like me will have so advance knowledge of html?? ye i have it lol) *Look I am batman because I make electronic ckts like that of Batman, I want to be a spy so have made a Spy microphone, this is first similerity


 * Second i dont have friends, People think of me as a Tough guy because of my height and body (I am tough guy)
 * I love dark things for example Black Spider man.
 * I love mumbai police
 * I am chuck because I repair peoples electronic items, I am innocent like Chuck I dont have a girl friend Suyogaerospace talk to me! 14:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC) so its up to you Batman or chuck ;)

DYK nom
Hi, please see noted on T:TDYK regarding your nomination of Ravi Datt Mehta for DYK. Renata (talk) 20:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

nepal
hi. plz note that there is a separate article on the presidential election, Nepalese presidential election, 2008. You might want to add material there instead. --Soman (talk) 13:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * thanx, --Soman (talk) 13:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

No-confindence vote
Perhaps we should create a separate July 22 no-confidence vote against the Indian government article? The event is notable in its own right, with all the controversies, and material could be shifted from the UPA and Indo-US nuclear deal articles. What do you think? --Soman (talk) 20:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: July Newsletter
Hello Gppande! I sincerely apologize for being away from Wikipedia. I'd been quite busy over the past week and hence could hardly spend any time on my wiktivities. However, it was good to see that you do a great job with the next draft. I'll wait for the last two days before filling up the entries and interesting tidbits for the next newsletter. I'm sure we'll do this once in a month. Thanks to Tinucherian, who is quite enthusiastic with supporting the delivery tasks. Just one thought: For the DYKs, as I had initially thought, I feel that we could have 1-3 DYKs from the newest WP:India articles. I say 1-3 because it can vary according to the required formatting. Btw, wasn't that one excellent trust vote yesterday? Do you support the N-deal? Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Need focused locator maps for states
Hi, Some of the state locator maps are not focusing on the state but rather trying to the whole region. For example, Manipur and other North-East states and Sikkim etc. For Assam, I guess it is fine. The present map does not help much while trying to locate a town in say, Manipur. Can you please change the maps so that they are zoomed in, focusing on the state rather than the whole region? For example, Goa/Bihar maps are focused on the state. Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 07:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Gppande,
Can u help me improve my article urgently Brhmoism. As it can be speedy deleted regards/ thanks --Dralansun (talk) 09:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahmedabad
Hi! Tried to copyedit and provide ref in some part of the history section. Tried to provide URLs this time even for the books. Please have a look if the URLs are working correctly. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Newsletter
Updated and added new content. Please check it out and let me know if there needs some changes or something that needs discussion. My apologies for the delay in reply. I've been tied up in real life and my wiki-activity has reduced drastically since the past few weeks. I hope you are doing well. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you! Your nice message on my talk page is greatly appreciated. Hope you are doing well. Let me get to the PINQ soon - you know why I'm late, don't you!? Best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Police Logo
Hi thanks for using my Pic! I want to point out that the pic used as Nagpur/Mumbai Police logo is not their Logo (LOL) its logo of Maharashtra Police Mumbai Polic's and Nagpur Polices logo is Diffrent soon I'll be uploding Mumbai Polic's logo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suyogaerospace (talk • contribs) 15:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 90% of logo is same but rest of is diff for eg MP has star, hand and motto but it is enclosed in a circular ring when I'll uplod the original logo of MP then you will understand the diff- Suyogaerospace talk to me! 17:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

ITN
The recognition templates have been severely underused, and I try to hand them out as many as I can. Article talk pages are first on my priority list, and some articles currently on ITN don't have a tag. Otherwise, I don't see why you can't give yourself a recognition tag if you honestly did some work on the article worthy of recognition. I keep a personal count (see my userpage), and I probably haven't received a recognition tag for several of them. Happy editing,  Spencer T♦C 02:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, sure.  Spencer T♦C 21:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Kosi river
This article which was enlarged by me has been substantially mutilated by Sangam Mulmi and the revised verison does not even accept the contribution of the earlier auhtor. external refrences have been missed are not shown there is no continutiy of refrences. Also one of the pictures which I have uploaded on Kosi's shifting courses does not open eventhough the title of the photo is displayed in red colour. Can you tell me what is happening since you have earlier deleted artcles put up Sangam Mulmi.--Nvvchar (talk) 18:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Hiiiiii
Hi I have uploaded two more pics on Mumbai Police article see weather if you can use it in Nagpur police article. hey I got my first Barnstar please help me to place it on my user page I am not able to find best place on my user page should I create new sub page for it??-- Suyogaerospace talk to me! 15:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Check my userpage I have created new subpage for Awards-- Suyogaerospace talk to me! 12:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

ITN
Hi, Sorry, I hav again forgotten that you collect those... But you know what, the template is really messy. Can you write something more compact so that it will look like ? Would make things much easier for me. Cheers. --Tone 19:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Nice work. That will make things easier in future. Cheers. --Tone 21:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Closure of POK discussion
Hello, Gppande. I would like to let you know that I am unterested in the question and would like to defend the cause, if it reopens in the future. Please, apprise me of it, because I do not observe often the AfD page, but concur unanimously with you that the article is no POV and deserves its exstence. Best regards Bogorm (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Maharashtra Barnstar
Template:Maharashtra Barnstar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. I got this some one is goint to dele this help me -- Suyogaerospace talk to me! 08:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Current events
Hey! Would you be interested in updating some Indian current events articles like: and
 * 27 September 2008 Delhi blast
 * 30 September 2008 western India bombings
 * 2008 Jodhpur stampede ? -- make a  difference  06:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:2008 Agartala bombings
Yeah, you are right. I saw your main page contributions, and I must say you are very regular! Keep it up! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 08:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ~ Ttony21(talk, contribs) 16:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I regret to inform you that you've been blocked from editing because of your edit warring. If you wish to contest this block, please add to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * In response to your unblock request, you reverted several users, not just one Icelandic admin. Of course, I'll leave this up for another admin to read and decide on. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 11:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, but I always invited them to talkpage to discuss. I left 3 hints to people who were reverting to the news item I was trying to add. I left section on talk page, I added Template:Discuss in section on the main page, I left hidden comment on the top of the section. People kept ignoring all 3 messages and were deleting the section. In case of Icelandic admin, I left him message on his talk page and still got no reply from him. Second time he did the same and left another message. I replied to all his messages promptly. I just now checked the history of the page and he has reverted my edits more than thrice. I done enough to bring people to talk and discuss. Edit summary shows the same. I never want to go to edit war. I want to stop it. But unfortunately I seem to be the one who is getting blocked. Above all, I am adding only genuine matter to the article. This is really no justice. -- gp pande  «talk»  12:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I know Iceland is not up for sale. Please read to the bottom. Check the change in heading done by user:meco. Initially he was against but latter did changes to the title which he provided with good reason. I accepted to that. There are others on talk page which accept that the news item should go to the article. And if 3RR rule is to be so strictly adhered to then admin User:Haukurth should be blocked. He too reverted me thrice. I don't want anyone to be blocked including me. Just trying to put my argument. This is no justice. I have given sufficient arguments, time, messages not to revert, edit summary showing not to do undo but first discuss. Three messages should be enough for person to come to talk page. Infact, Icelandic admin got 2 personal messages on his talk page to which he never replied. -- gp pande  «talk»  12:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I always invited them to talkpage to discuss. I left 3 hints to people who were reverting to the news item I was trying to add. I left section on talk page, I added Template:Discuss in section on the main page, I left hidden comment on the top of the section. People kept ignoring all 3 messages and were deleting the section. In case of Icelandic admin, I left him message on his talk page and still got no reply from him. Second time he did the same and left another message. I replied to all his messages promptly. I just now checked the history of the page and he has reverted my edits more than thrice. I done enough to bring people to talk and discuss. Edit summary shows the same. I never want to go to edit war. I want to stop it. But unfortunately I seem to be the one who is getting blocked. Above all, I am adding only genuine matter to the article. This is really no justice.-- gp pande  «talk»  12:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's good that you invited other users to discuss. However, that doesn't automatically mean that you get to have your desired edits made.  You are blocked for 3RR, not for the content of your edits.  However, I want you to know that I agree with those editors who say that this piece of information is trivial.  One person's joke of putting Iceland up for sale on eBay might be good for a few funny news articles, but it is not an important moment in Iceland's history, and six months from now, it will not matter. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

See-I never wanted to get into edit war. I wanted to stop it. But unfortunately I seem to be the one who is getting blocked. I always invited people on talkpage to discuss. I left 3 hints to people who were reverting to the news item I was trying to add. I always invited them to talkpage to discuss. I left messages - People kept ignoring all 3 messages and were deleting the section. In case of admin User:Haukurth, I left him message on his talk page and still got no reply from him. He kept reverting my edits. I replied to all his personal opinion arguments on talkpage promptly. I just now checked the history of the page and he has reverted my edits more than thrice. if 3RR rule is to be so strictly adhered to then admin User:Haukurth should be blocked. He too reverted me thrice. I don't want anyone to be blocked including me. Just trying to put my argument. This is no justice. I done enough to bring people to talk and discuss. Edit summary shows the same. I know Iceland is not up for sale. But what's wrong in mentioning one of the most read news in media on WP. There have always been popular media section in current articles. Also, check the change in heading done by user:meco. Initially he was against (on talkpage) but latter did changes to the title which he provided with good reason. I accepted to that. There are others on talk page which accept that the news item should go to the article. I accepted other's views when they explained. But some seem to blindly follow what they feel right without discussion. I have given sufficient arguments, time, messages not to revert, edit summary showing not to do undo but first discuss. Three messages should be enough for person to come to talk page. Infact, Icelandic admin got 2 personal messages on his talk page still no reply.-- gp pande  «talk»  12:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * section on talk page
 * Template:Discuss in section on the main page
 * hidden comment on the top of the section asking to read talkpage.

I did not think it would be constructive to reply to your attacks on me on my talk page. That's why I haven't done so. Haukur (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * How about replying to talk page? You seem not interested in discussion on matter you hate to agree. Same seems to be done for blocking. Block without second notice. -- gp pande  «talk»  13:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've made many comments on the talk page, including replies to you. Haukur (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me list down your replies on talk page -

Where did you reply to the points I raised??? Everytime you described your mind. You never went into a discussion like other people and tried to reach an agreement. You were enforcing your views each time you reverted my edit without any prior notice or line. Let me clarify. I have a great respect for Iceland and I am not putting this new item to offend anyone. Infact, I wrote a DYK India-Iceland relations. It's just that people started reverting the additions mindlessly made me take up this course. Present some reasons - not opinions. -- gp pande  «talk»  13:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you please stop adding this trivial joke? Haukur (talk) 16:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a trivial joke, it doesn't describe anything real and it doesn't belong here. Haukur (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The news media regularly reports on trivialities which are of no interest to an encyclopedia. Haukur (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As I said above I wouldn't want this at the eBay article either. Haukur (talk) 09:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was merely pointing out that there is no contradiction in my views. Haukur (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Look, you've put this into the article 11 times and been reverted by four different editors. This has been your only contribution to the article. And yet you're accusing me of "enforcing my views". For reference, you haven't quoted all my comments about this. Haukur (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, I forgot to mention one more of your opinion You've already put it into EBay#Unusual_sale_items - isn't that enough? I would personally prefer not having it in any article. The media is full of silly stories which we don't repeat. Haukur (talk) 08:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Out of that 11 times you have counted, 2 users have already agreed to keep it. Infact, now I am gone but, other users are expanding the section. See, I am blocked but other people are adding to the section. This is really abuse of power. Clear indication that this is not a block in good faith. -- gp pande  «talk»  13:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You do realize that I didn't block you? Haukur (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I know that you didn't block me but your like minded admins. I forgot to type the name and one who rejected the appeal. Anyways, do you have answers to my points? Do you still intend to go on removing the section from the page? Do you intend to block those who would expand it? -- gp pande  «talk»  14:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not the news, and tries to make the material in an article be material that is of lasting importance. Would you be willing to agree to wait three months before restoring this paragraph?  If this is still important three months from now, you could make a stronger claim that this information is of lasting importance. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I would definitely wait that long. No problems. I won't touch the main article other than talk page. Now (since you were one of participating admin), can you explain the reason behind I being blocked for 3RR (considering others are adding to that very section) while Haukur who also reverted thrice WITHOUT REASON? Why I am targeted here? Why there is no justice? What separates me and him (other than the case that I invite discussion and he does what he wants?) -- gp pande  «talk»  14:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Questions like 'where is there no justice?' are outside the scope of my position as Wikipedia administrator, and should be directed to a philosopher. :) I responded to your request for an unblock.  I looked to see if you had violated 3RR, and you had.  So I declined.  It really is that simple.  There's no conspiracy against you, or at least, if there is, I haven't been invited to join it.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed and I am not accusing any conspiracy theory. I understand you took decision based on the fact presented to you. But now, going through this discussion and seeing the changes/expansion done by others on the section (for which I am blocked) do you think my action were ill-intended? My point is, look at facts - from all angle. Understand why I violated 3RR? Edit's from others will provide you the answers. -- gp pande  «talk»  14:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You seem like such a reasonable guy that I hate to disappoint you, but, no. I don't understand what you saw in this bit of news that seemed important to include in an encyclopedia article about the financial crisis.  I don't understand why you thought that it wasn't trivial.  And I don't get how it became so important to you that it was worth edit-warring over.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:17, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Marathi nationalism
I think you are right GP. That is regionalism and not nationalism. They do not want a seperate nation as of now. But I still have to research on the differences between nationalism and regionalism. So, a Weak delete from my side as of now. Hope it helps the process. Thanks, Kensplanet  Talk  Contributions  16:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

ITN

 * No problem. I've only got ~4 credits even though I updated/nominated 27 articles! It's sort of disappointing that I'm the only one that really pays attention to this recognition (Tone's gottn quite better, though), but if you didn't get well-deserved recognition, just leave a note on my talk page, even if I didn't post your item. I'm an admin now, and I can update the template, so if you also need something to be put up, you can let me know. Best regards,  Spencer T♦C 11:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I see for the Sachin Tendulkar, you need a posting admin. You can always leave a little note on my talk page asking me to check ITN/C, because sometimes I may be doing stuff elsewhere on wikipedia and just don't see it. Thanks,  Spencer T♦C 13:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't see any reason for the delay in adding Sachin's world record feat? This is really annoying! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was gone, and Tone posted it. Thanks for clarifying. I wasn't quite sure if the article was updated, and I couldn't see a clear wording suggestion. I'll try to do better next time.  Spencer T♦C 01:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Ayesha Takia
Hello there!!!!

In My POV, The text in the reference section was obscene and disrespectful. You can check that here. According to me, a biography of living people should not contain such elements. It is a speculative claim, which was verified with a gossip column. WP:BLP says Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable third-party sources, it may include original research and unverifiable statements, and could lead to libel claims.

However, if you do not agree with me then you may restore the previous version.

happy Editing!!!!

Hitro 15:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Chilika Lagoon
I saw a recnet setellite picture of Chilika Lake in theri latest brochure. Can it be uploaded by you. Thank you--Nvvchar (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Admins
I'm disappointed with the comment you made here as it is not constructive, and can constitute an assumption of bad faith. While I can appreciate why you may hold such a view, I don't think it's particularly appropriate for the venue in which you've said it.

I think a lot of administrators will not be pleased that those sorts of aspersions are being cast when each individual administrator acts on their own judgement, and it could be considered offensive. I know a very good admin Ganeshk whose heavily involved in WikiProject India, who does apologize on the rare occasions he stuffs up. He's one of the biggest assets we have at WikiProject India and I don't think he'll find that very pleasant to read at all. I hope you reconsider either refactoring or removing the comment - perhaps if an ANI is opened, you can post a generalization like that there, so administrators can respond to a general comment that is made about them. Regards, Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Heh, thanks for understanding. You probably have some legitimate concerns that they may be able to answer better, but certainly, no problem with your response on my talk page. :) I've appreciated the comments you've made at the noticeboard - they've often been very helpful and of a good standard, so that's probably why I was a little disappointed when I read it. Anyway, cheers again ;) Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Google Maps
Hey, I just saw a post on Nvvchar's page on Google maps. Google maps are not free. You can use NASA World Wind maps as an alternative. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  18:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Aap Kaa Suroor 2 - Ae Himesh Bhai
Inre the AFD, The film has been made. You can watch the bloopers and download the music. I found it on Google. Definitely not WP:Crystal.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

MNS
Likes your edits on the elected reps. I think it would be good on all part pages. (esp. the smaller parties)

I know it's a lot of work for you along, but you can put it up on the India discussion page for others to help in. Lihaas (talk) 04:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I guess this is a false alarm!
Are you going to cut down on your edits? No ways it just me getting a little hyper!! But ... if that's actually the case--please don't! The block was crap! Don't let it affect your WP contribs. You have been an excellent editor and your contributions are top-notch. The block was needless and don't think about it...admins get carried away at times.. You have really made a change to Wikipedia...especially WP India ... WP India never had an editor who contributed so meticulously to WP:ITN. Regards, --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 17:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow...a great relief! Hahaha! --KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 15:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)