User talk:Gqcwiki/sandbox

Peer Review
I think this article is very well done and I especially like the way that many words are linked to their Wikipedia pages in case anyone needs clarification. I think there is a large amount of information about Farber which is general and also specific which is appropriate for a Wikipedia biography. The language is biased and there are a large amount of references. There is one point where "Children's Hospital" is mentioned and I think it might be helpful to mention where the Children's Hospital is and some information about it. Celsisa (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review #2: Overall, you have made so many substantial contributions to the page, and your tone is very unbiased and instructive. Some suggestions I have include: Make sure each fact is supported with evidence (i.e. citations!); add more links to other wikipedia articles (the lede could have Antifolates, red blood cell transfusions in “Father of modern chemotherapy” section, Wilms’ tumor, etc.); this is nitpicky, but I would change one of your sentences to “In 1947, Farber conducted a clinical trial on aminopterin…” Kmm257 (talk) 06:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey all - thanks for all the feedback! It was very helpful in polishing the article to its final draft. Some things I focused on especially were: Thanks again! Gqcwiki (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * making sure everything was cited with unbiased sources (like using a different source on the Dana-Farber Institute besides the institute's own website)
 * making sure WikiLinks were present and convenient
 * getting rid of the unnecessary Mukherjee quotation (and incorporating the content into the paragraph itself, without direct quotation)
 * reorganizing the 'Career' section to highlight his most significant accomplishments and fleshing out the content of these subsections