User talk:Gqu

Gqu (talk) 09:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Event-probability interpretation of quantum theory


The article Event-probability interpretation of quantum theory has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NN and WP:FRINGE.  Article describes a non-notable theory.  The article title is a neologism used only used by its inventor.  On this topic, this author has written one conference talk and one vanity press book (Nova Science Publishers), neither have any citations (except self-citation).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 22:14, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Informational Time


The article Informational Time has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * NN, FRINGE.  Article is promoting a NN theory.  Only references are three fringe, never-cited articles by a single author Gunn Quznetsov, who appears to be the article creator GQu.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bm gub2 (formerly User:Bm_gub) 20:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Informational Time concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Informational Time, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:16, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Event-probability interpretation of quantum theory


A tag has been placed on Event-probability interpretation of quantum theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.quantumdiaries.org/2014/02/07/interpretations-of-quantum-mechanics/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)