User talk:Gr.Deodatus

Welcome!
Hello, Gr.Deodatus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jubensha did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi! Thank you for your detailed message. Could you please help me identity what to do differently to be accepted? My edits were not original research but claims backed up by three scholars in the topic (two Chinese) and/or an American video journalist. With proper citations as far as I know. Best, M Gr.Deodatus (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The YouTube video is by People Make Games and when I checked out their channel, they don't have a link to an official website (which you would check to see if they list their editorial standards) and only link to a Patreon. Similarly, the blog you cited (Nordic Larp) says it republished an article from "Distance of Touch: The Knutpunkt 2022 Magazine" which I couldn't find in either SagePub or JSTOR. It looks like "Knutpunkt 2022" was a fan conference about LARP and the magazine was published for that. So I reverted your edits for using WP:SELFPUBLISH sources (see also RSPYT) that fail the verifiability policy. That policy does state: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. If you believe you can prove that for either source, please post over at Reliable sources/Noticeboard where editors discuss the reliability of sources. You can also bring questions about sources to the Teahouse which is a great resource for new editors. Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)