User talk:Gr1st/Archive 17

Update
Hi Gr1st

My name is Atze Zwirs from Atos Origin and I would like to point out that Atos Origin has changed it's name to Atos and is joined by SIS (siemens integrated systems)

we have issued a press release about it

http://atos.net/en-us/Newsroom/en-us/Press_Releases/2011/2011_07_01_01.htm

We know we cannot update our own wikipedia page. So please use the press release for information. We would like an unbiased update.

With kind regards

atze.zwirs@atos.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.240.19 (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for doing this in an appropriate way. Page content updated; a request to move the page to Atos has been lodged at WP:RM. Gr1st (talk) 16:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Public companies
Hello Gr1st,

I saw that you changed the type of company, which I had put as “public”, of Intesa Sanpaolo, Telecom Italia, Luxottica and Bulgari articles back to “società per azioni”. I had made the changes because “public” is the English translation of “società per azioni” and I saw that several other “public” companies have the same definition on their articles (e.g. Benetton, Piaggio, Edison, Apple, News Corporation).

May I ask you why you are considering “public” somehow confusing for an English speaking audience?

I’m looking forward to hearing your feedback, Jules Nidi (talk) 09:25, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Public is not the English translation of società per azioni. Società per azioni is a specific classification of company under Italian law. It is somewhat analogous, for example, to public limited company (a specific legal type in i.a. the United Kingdom) but it is not exactly the same. It is a specific type of entity endemic to Italy. The parameter is "company type" - therefore it seems eminently sensible to state the actual company type rather than a generic term like "public". Gr1st (talk) 18:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TelecityGroup.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:TelecityGroup.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Lagardère Group
Hi Gr1st,

I apologize for bothering you with this, but A limited partnership with shares has no chief executive officer. As a Limited partnership with shares, Lagardère SCA has two “General and Managing Partner”: Arnaud Lagardère as a person and the company Arjil Commandité – Arco (of which Arnaud Lagardère is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer). The positions mentioned in the various press releases are uncorrect. The only official document is the annual report which the “Management page” is extracted from. Thanks in advance for your comprehension, if it's ok for you, do you want me to correct it ? Best, douglas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.171.49.213 (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Fine, please go ahead. Gr1st (talk) 06:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Perfect, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.3.206.160 (talk) 10:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EDP Renováveis.png
 Thanks for uploading File:EDP Renováveis.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  12:52, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Energias de Portugal.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Energias de Portugal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Antena 3.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Antena 3.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Luxottica page
Hello Gr1st,

I noticed that you recently updated Luxottica’s financial figures. I wanted to reintroduce myself to you. We corresponded late last year about some changes that I had made to the Luxottica page. You correctly noted that the texts I posted were not objective. I will no longer make changes myself as I realise that is contrary to the rules on conflict of interest. I have created a user page for myself where I say who I am and how I want to help to improve the page. Would you be willing to consider some elements currently missing from the Luxottica page that would make it more informative? Any advice would be very welcome when you have time. Thanks, Michele Laterza (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to propose additions to the article (best to post them on its talk page for review). In my opinion, the most important things are: 1) the text should not simply be copied from Luxottica publications (e.g. annual reports); 2) the text should completely adhere to the neutral point of view policy; and 3) the article's text already relies heavily on one section of the Luxottica website as a reference. Other independent but reliable sources (e.g. books or reputable newspapers/news websites) should be used to support statements made. Gr1st (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello Gr1st, thanks for your feedback. I will start proposing new references on Luxottica talk page as you suggested. Michele Laterza (talk) 07:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SES.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:SES.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Atos Wikipedia page - neutrality is disputed
Dear Wiki editor,

We notice that the neutrality is disputed for the section of the Atos Wikipedia page entitled: ‘Controversy over benefit assessments’. We would like to work with you to increase the clarity of this page to the benefit of all readers.

As you may have seen the recent Harrington report recognised that “Atos takes the brunt of public criticism for the WCA” (for which they are not responsible for the medical policy, only in the delivery of that policy). (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmworpen/1015/101506.htm para 92). This perhaps helps explain why the neutrality is in dispute.

We have more information and supporting evidence on the contract that Atos Healthcare has with the DWP and would like to work with you to update this page. We would be happy to send you further information for you to update or to update ourselves or to discuss in more detail via the ‘talkpage’.

Please let us know which works best for you.

Best regards

a144808A144808 (talk) 14:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Standard Life.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Standard Life.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Update Manz Automation
Hi GR1st, I'm an employee of Manz and I've checked the article about Manz Automation... I noticed that there are some outdated facts. Manz has a new logo (the actual one is already inserted in the . In the info-box on the right side the employee figure and the product range could be updated (lab automation doesn't exist any longer). And the article itself could be a bit more detailed. On the Manz-Websiteyou can find lots of information for it. As I don't want to update the article of "my" company maybe you could make an unbiased update? Tanks in advance, TWmanzAG (talk) 15:47, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have also noted the official name change and moved the article to Manz. I have attempted to expand the article to a reasonable level, however I don't really have time at the moment to drive a significant expansion of the article beyond this point. Regards, Gr1st (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Great – thank you for the fast update of the article! Reading it I found two passages that are not totally correct. It would be very kind if you corrected them: Thanks again for your support, TWmanzAG (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Source No.2 of the first sentence is no longer up to date (the area “healthcare” doesn’t exist any longer) – actual information you could find here and on this site
 * In my opinion the last sentence of the second paragraph is a bit misleading. Automation is not a business unit. It is one of several core competencies and part of nearly all products that Manz develops. The area “carbide cutting tools” was closed.
 * Revised as per the above. Gr1st (talk) 13:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Orion Corporation.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Orion Corporation.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Arbel Fauvet Rail
Hello. You added a CAC snall companies template to Arbel Fauvet Rail but the company doesn't appear to be on the list? I'm not familiar with this - can you update the list or remove the template. (Note "Fauvet Girel" is on the list - but I think it is defunct.Imgaril (talk) 20:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * A mistake on my part - Fauvet Girel redirects to Arbel Fauvet Rail. The company still exists but a closer look at its current profile (only financial investments) suggests it would be inappropriate to have the template on the Arbel Fauvet Rail page. Removed. Gr1st (talk) 13:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Criteria CaixaCorp.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Criteria CaixaCorp.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)