User talk:Grace&redeemption

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Martin Luther King III. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martin_Luther_King_III&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Luther King III with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Martin Luther King III shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Carolhlloyd for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)