User talk:Grace Gunawan

Speedy deletion of User:Fulldive/sandbox


The page User:Fulldive/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Spencer T• C 23:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page.  Spencer T• C 00:24, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Rename to Gio
not successful. We already have one. Please choose again. See Special:CentralAuth to check the availability of usernames. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 09:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 30723
https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30723 is now closed. Response carried over: -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 10:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Alright, my mistake. Sorry about that, I'm a first-time user so I'm still learning and should have read the policy more thoroughly. I'm just wondering how is the company profile such as Zoom is written then and that's not considered as promotional? Regarding the company article I write, I'll stop it and won't do any of it again. I'm confirming that i'm an individual user with the new username. I'm confirming to abide by the terms of use of Wikipedia. I'm intending to edit article with the one i'm familiar with such as fashion, food, business, music and culture. I'm resolving that I'm not a paid contributor anymore. Thanks

So, here I'm confirming that i'm an individual user with the new username. I'm confirming to abide by the terms of use of Wikipedia. I'm intending to edit article with the one i'm familiar with such as fashion, food, business, music and culture. I will stop writing article about any company anymore. I'm resolving that I'm not a paid contributor anymore. Please do tell me how to change that status here. Sorry for the mistake I made. This is a first-time I'm using it and I will go through the policy again. Hopefully this will be resolved soon and please kindly unblock my account. Thanks


 * Can an admin get rid of the extra unblock requests?  Java Hurricane  09:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Renamed to Grace Gunawan - currently reviewing other block aspects Nosebagbear (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Pinging blocking admin . I'm reviewing this case - I'm currently inclined to think that with suitable preconditions/restrictions, an unblock could be considered, but could use your thoughts? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Concur, assuming suitable preconditions. User mentions some specific topics interested in contributing to, more than a lot of the unblock requests I see. Thanks for the ping. Best,  Spencer T• C 13:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

, hi there. I'm willing to unblock you if you understand and agree to the following criteria - please let me know beforehand if you're unsure or unclear about any of them.
 * 1) You will not engage in any paid editing, including but not limited to editing/creating any page on Fulldive or editing about them in other related articles.
 * 2) You confirm that you have read the guidance and rules against promotional editing, including Wikipedia isn't promotional and how to avoid being an accidental spammer
 * 3) You confirm awareness that areas in which you any other conflict of interest (COI) in (that is, non-paid COIs), you'll declare that on the relevant talk page and make proposed edits there, rather than altering the article directly.
 * 4) You agree to make sure to ask either myself, or another experienced editor (I suggest the Teahouse) if you're unsure whether an edit may be promotional or a potential COI breach
 * 5) You confirm awareness that anything saved on Wikipedia is, to some degree, "published", and so some standards apply even to non-article pages.

Criteria 2-5 are primarily general good practice. Criterion 1 would be a formal editing restriction. If agreed, it can be appealed to myself or the administator's noticeboard after 6 months. If successfully appealed, then the usual restrictions/disclosure requirements of paid editing will still be relevant.

Beyond them, I have some more general advice. You gave several broad areas you were interested in editing. They all sound very promising, and I'd suggest spending a while in there before branching into either the field Fulldive operates in, or other areas that are easier to break the rules in - assumptions of good faith in controversial areas are already lower than I might wish, and that would apply double to a recently unblocked editor.

As there's no indication of block evasion, edit warring, and so-on, I'm specifically not including additional prohibitions on that. If you decide to create a secondary account, drop me a line and I'll run you through it. Please note that the same restrictions would apply as above.

Let me know if those are all okay, or any questions you may have. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)