User talk:Grace Note

If you ever run for admin, please let me know
You said here that you'd never RfA, but please let me know if you ever change your mind. Your ideas on rotating power are interesting. -moritheil Talk 05:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Har. Ceoil (talk) 18:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * G-n; no, i was not laughing at you; intention was convey that you are too outspoken to pass a witch trial. Admin candidates cannot afford not to pull punches. Ceoil (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It is that very quality of not being a politician which I think we should see more often. -moritheil Talk 13:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * By way of explination for my suddenly turning up; you made a very perceptive comment on your user page about a stalking horse a while back; during that badsites hullabloo. I watchlisted you page then (something I rarely do) and its been interesting following you since. I like reading bright people's musings, what can I say. Ceoil (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi
In light of your comments at Wikipedia talk:Neutrality enforcement and the views expressed on your user page, I am disappointed that you did not leap to the support of my proposal for parallel articles, suggested here and here and here.

The idea seems much in line with your views, but, of course, no one has supported it. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Good instincts
After reviewing the history of the "Sam Blacketer" incident I noticed that you were among the very few who opposed his adminship. I just wanted to compliment everyone who did since all of you had either good instincts, good reasoning and weren't afraid of going against the grain. If you ever seek adminship then please let me know - we need more good admins. TheGoodLocust (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I was looking at more logs (no I'm not stalking you), and found that you opposed both William Connolley's adminship and Guettarda's. Initially I wasn't going to compliment you for the first one, but then I laughed out loud when I saw the second. At this point I think wikipedian's "requests for adminship" should begin and end with you, but hey, maybe I'm wrong and you are just a polemic. TheGoodLocust (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Lydda and Ramla
Hi Grace Note! I have replied to your comment at Talk:1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramla. Please have a look. —Ynhockey (Talk) 12:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Grace Note, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User talk:Grace Note/Archive January-March 2006. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Editor assistance list
Hello. Since your account has recently not been editing very regularly, on the page Editor assistance/list you name has been moved to a list of editors who are willing to give assistance, but may not always be available. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list. You are, of course, welcome to move yourself back to the other list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

(I don't know where to start)
Just ... O my. (It would be good if you would please date your essay. I -- and I presume others -- would better understand what you're saying if we knew that any particular essay were from, say, 2004, not last week.) GcT (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Well yeah but all edits are dated anyway and I don't care. I deleted most of it anyway. Don't fool yourself though. Looking around, I see it's still shit, particularly for women. But it's not worth fighting over. Grace Note (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

June 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:MintPress News. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! ''To wit: Oh I didn't realise you people were controlling this. Tommy-Sizzle is obviously right but you've appointed yourselves arbiters so I guess this article will be one more that's dishonest and nothing anyone can do about it.Grace Note (talk) 03:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)'' Doug Weller  talk 07:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, I get it. I didn't realise you were gatekeeping that page. There's no point bullying me. I don't give a fuck. Grace Note (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a week for spreading unpleasantness in this collaborative project. Probably you have been here long enough not to need any references to particular policies that these edits violate; I expect you've heard of them. I note the unpleasantness of your userpage too. Not sure why you bother to edit here at all? You can request unblock by placing  on this page. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC).