User talk:Grace and Fuller

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grace and Fuller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Grace_and_Fuller Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hirolovesswords&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Grace_and_Fuller reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

RE: Request on 14:51:10, 27 December 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Grace and Fuller
Article topics are presumed to be notable if they have been covered directly and in detail by independent, third-party sources. Testimonials that appear on your company website and letters you have sent are not third-party sources. Articles that do not mention the subject directly also do not demonstrate notability. Further, writing an article about your organization creates a conflict of interest and such articles are often deleted if even slightly inappropriate.

Based on the sources currently provided, I do not believe Expian meets the Wikipedia's general notability guideline or the notability guideline for products. However, if you believe your product is notable enough to deserve an article, I believe the best course of action would be to follow the steps at WP:BFAQ and have a third-party create the article instead, which would avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for your time.

Donna

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hirolovesswords was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Grace and Fuller/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Grace_and_Fuller Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hirolovesswords&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Grace_and_Fuller reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Google
I have tagged your page as WP:NOINDEX, which should remove it from some search engines, including Google. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of sandbox
I can have your submission deleted, however the website I believe you are referring to, wikirecent.com, is not affiliated with Wikipedia. Therefore, it may continue to appear after the page is deleted. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)