User talk:Grackelack

Hello Grackelack. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SmartSE (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Get out of here with your accusations. A thank you for creating the article would be nice, but instead I get the nice messages above. See my response on the investigation page you list above. I'll wait for your confirmation that I am not related to these people, along with your apology. Take your issues out on them but don't accuse and link me to someone who I am not! --Grackelack (talk) 21:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Performance Marketing for Professionals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Performance Marketing for Professionals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Performance Marketing for Professionals& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ireneshih (talk) 15:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)