User talk:Gradient1021

Welcome!
Hello, Gradient1021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 23:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Zetta-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zetta-logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Zetta - AboutUs.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Acknowledged
Moved comments to correct page.

Draft:Zetta Medical Technologies
Hi again, I certainly would not want to delete your draft as it is still work in progress. As I think your quickly understanding, the reason we 'advise' (but not ban) editors from making articles about their company is that it only too easy to make it look full of puffery (even if true), which makes it harder to pass Review. Please read Verifiability, not truth It encourages copyright errors to creep in as well -as in your draft. It is only human nature to write about one's own company in the best possible light and introduce puffery and fall out-side copyright laws. We acknowledge this and so help new editors over this hurdle. Please read our Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and follow those those suggestions through. You will then be able to help keep the article up-to date and correct errors without having to learn all our geeky policies which an online encyclopedia needs to adhere to -nor suffer future deletions and reverts. Hope this helps in some very small way. Aspro (talk) 12:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Aspro
Thank you these are really good articles that I was not aware of. I will need to go through it in detail to understand how to do properly declare my relationship and make sure it is clear. I also have to figure out whom I can ask to publish the article if I cant do it myself. I do not know anyone who is a Wikipedian or an editor for that matter. One other thing I will do it to provide a lot of verification for the article I wrote. I appreciate any advice I get. Thank you again. "Gradient1021 (talk) 02:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)"


 * You don't need to know any WP editors to get this article onto WP when it is ready. If your current review does not succeed, then after re-editing, submit it again using Template:AFC submission. That is all you need to reach other WP editors who can approve it. This is a relative new type of service that your company is providing, which didn’t exist 25 years ago.  Ask most Doctors that graduated 'just 5 years ago'  to  explain positron emission tomography and they may reply “What?”.  So am wondering, if it may help, to put your companies services in to context by spelling out 'why' your companies services are needed in the modern field of medical diagnostics, rather than assume that everyone else on WP  is up-to date with this technology. This would also help the readers of WP (and this is for whom we create the articles) to make more sense of why your company exits and why it is growing.  Also, (and a must) declare   your COI on your User:Gradient1021 page. Give a brief autobiography of yourself there. It makes it easier for other editors to know where your coming from. Don't post you own email address on your user page  but you can post the company's contact details. It is possible to exchange email with other editors (privately) but let's leave that until another time. Aspro (talk) 12:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

I truly appreciate your advice and guidance ASPRO
Thank you again, your recommendations make perfect sense and I will make the recommended modifications/additions. I was wondering about the proper place to add the COI but now I know (i added it to this talk page earlier). I will also make it happen and share the details about the importance of working on the advanced products discussed in the article. You are correct, sometime we assume everyone knows what we know but obviously this is not always the case. I just hope I can do all of this prior to the speedy deletion notice placed on the page. Thank you again and hope we can continue to work together more. "Gradient1021 (talk) 22:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)"

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zetta Medical Technologies


A tag has been placed on Draft:Zetta Medical Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. IM3847 (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)