User talk:Graduate Historian



Hello, Graduate Historian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * New contributors' help page | Help
 * Where to ask questions | Frequently asked questions
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Guide to Wikipedia
 * The simplified ruleset for Wikipedia | Manual of Style
 * Things to work on at Wikipedia
 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Civis Romanus (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Civis Romanus (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pen y Bryn. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

''Your edits have deleted a number of passage of text backed up by reliable sources. I suggest that you explain your edits, either via edit summaries or at Talk:Pen y Bryn. If there is opposition to the edits—which there appears to be—discuss the matter at the talk page to get consensus before changing.'' —C.Fred (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Added notations to Talk: Pen Y Bryn and explained edits (Graduate Historian (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)) see following: I have looked through the sources on Pen Y Bryn and they are not scholarly except for one citing which is a 1990's citing and old material. Some of the sources are blogs with no historical background and no name recognition. I have made the edits because I know Students use Wikipedia for articles and of course it should reflect as much accuracy as possible! Could We hold off on re-editing until the scholarly presentations can be scanned and given citation references? That would bring the article up to date. If not at least let's remove all the blog sources which could have been put up by Students or anybody with no History background! As I contribute more I hope to add more primary sources to other pages (Graduate Historian (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC))

Talk Page
Please add messages if you have any that I need to respond to!