User talk:GrafSpee65

Sir, With all my respect! You have removed my text about the Hawker Sea Fury without serious raisons Have you had the humility to check the cited reference? I'm really wondering. Tell me about your expectation. I wrote this text based on historical fact with cited reference. Regards,


 * Copied to and answered on article talk page. - Nick Thorne  talk  21:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * GrafSpee65, it would seem that you are new here, and that you have only edited the one article so far. Please take time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines before you make significant edits to articles again.  The best bet is to stick to minor corrections and so on, until you get the feel for it.
 * Learn how to use article and user talk pages. You posted the same thing on my talk page, as well as yours and your user page.  This is not necessary.  You do not need to use a talkback template when posting on another user's talk page, they will see the post anyway.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages - insert four tildes after your post, ie: ~, this will automatically insert you username and the date and time.
 * Discussion about edits to an article should take place on the article talk page, not user talk pages. This is so that everyone that has the article on their watchlist will see the discussion and may then contribute if they wish. -  Nick Thorne  talk  21:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Your patronising twaddle about "humility" would carry a lot more weight if you'd even bothered to give a page number (it's 117, BTW). Nor is this source at all convincing as the FW 190 being the inspiration for the Sea Fury. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hawker Sea Fury. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  13:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)